0 members and 628 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
Currently building it, so ideally it should evolve steadily over the next couple days. Please keep checking back.
http://adam.cavanaughclan.net
HTML transitional and CSS, valid.
Resident father figure.
-
Looks promising, why is it not XHTML?
Seems easy enough, Can't even see many reasons why its not XHTML apart from the img tags.
Anyways, it looks promising, nice and simple 
But one thing, whats with the
Code:
<div id="container">
**<div id="shadet">
****<div id="shader">
******<div id="shadeb">
********<div id="shadel">
**********<div id="shadetr">
************<div id="shadebr">
**************<div id="shadebl">
****************<div id="shadetl">
******************<div id="stage">
********************<div id="header">
**********************<div id="headbl">
************************<div id="headbr">
**************************<div id="logo"></div>
Or is that because your working on it?
-
yay nice, i love hows done menu, except for the text maybe make it smaller or just change font
-
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Project_Number_10 @ Apr 3 2006, 11:07 AM) [snapback]163616[/snapback]</div>
Looks promising, why is it not XHTML?
Seems easy enough, Can't even see many reasons why its not XHTML apart from the img tags.
Anyways, it looks promising, nice and simple
But one thing, whats with the
Code:
<div id="container">
**<div id="shadet">
****<div id="shader">
******<div id="shadeb">
********<div id="shadel">
**********<div id="shadetr">
************<div id="shadebr">
**************<div id="shadebl">
****************<div id="shadetl">
******************<div id="stage">
********************<div id="header">
**********************<div id="headbl">
************************<div id="headbr">
**************************<div id="logo"></div>
Or is that because your working on it?
[/b]
the shade** layers form the dropshadow. although it looks complicated, it's actually alot simpler than any other method I've used.
And it's not XHTML for some very good reasons which I've just recently become aware of. Namely because XHTML isn't technically implemented in IE, which can cause problems. After a two hour discussion with some professional web developers it became apparent that unless you're using XML you shouldn't use XHTML. And since the difference between HTML (strict) and XHTML is minimal, there's really not a problem. In fact, if I closed the meta and img tags it would all validate in XHTML.
Resident father figure.
-
Like they say, code is harder to read than write
-
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Project_Number_10 @ Apr 3 2006, 01:27 PM) [snapback]163645[/snapback]</div>
Like they say, code is harder to read than write 
[/b]
I wouldn't say that :P
It looks quite nice, that menu is great! I just think the layout is a bit too small for my liking :P
-
i just was wathcin the page once again and one thing was really btohering me on that, ill be prolly just me, but when u hover the link there appear those small white arrows from the bottom, which i found as a great idea and i really like it except that, it seems to me really useless, cause when u hover the link with cursor u cant almost see them and it made me feel upset :lol: dunno why (im wierd nvm) , so i just thought if u wouldnt be interested in remaking those to make them appear on the top instead of bottom :blink:
-
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dick @ Apr 3 2006, 05:07 PM) [snapback]163674[/snapback]</div>
i just was wathcin the page once again and one thing was really btohering me on that, ill be prolly just me, but when u hover the link there appear those small white arrows from the bottom, which i found as a great idea and i really like it except that, it seems to me really useless, cause when u hover the link with cursor u cant almost see them and it made me feel upset :lol: dunno why (im wierd nvm) , so i just thought if u wouldnt be interested in remaking those to make them appear on the top instead of bottom  :blink:
[/b]
It bothered me too, but I think I came up with a decent way around it.
Resident father figure.
-
and when you resize the fonts (you never know who has it at different sizes right?) and the arrows don't fit anymore .. sooo yeah that made me sad
but still nice though :lol:
deaz\dxloa\dxedr

-
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Dick @ Apr 3 2006, 10:07 PM) [snapback]163674[/snapback]</div>
i just was wathcin the page once again and one thing was really btohering me on that, ill be prolly just me, but when u hover the link there appear those small white arrows from the bottom, which i found as a great idea and i really like it except that, it seems to me really useless, cause when u hover the link with cursor u cant almost see them and it made me feel upset :lol: dunno why (im wierd nvm) , so i just thought if u wouldnt be interested in remaking those to make them appear on the top instead of bottom  :blink:
[/b]
Yah the links annoyed me to with that, i want to see the rollover
Similar Threads
-
By RoughDraft in forum Digital Art
Replies: 8
Last Post: 09-07-2005, 05:30 PM
-
By B][G K in forum Digital Art
Replies: 16
Last Post: 08-03-2005, 12:24 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|