0 members and 3,175 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
-
-
the first one looks really good. as already said the text is improvable. (b.t.w. i´m a text noob aso i can´t give hints)
the background of the first one looks like tutorial-abuse but it looks good and that´s what counts.
the sub-zero sig looks ok, but the blending looks strange to me. there is no realism in that. maybe you can improve that. and the blue of the background is very simple.
i´m not saying that i can do any better, but that´s what i suggest. =)
current:

fav:

-
Text doesn't really fit the sig, in my opinion.
-
the only things i dont like, is the text, but it seems like every1 has trouble with text so i wouldnt worry about it
and the opacity an the renders seems to low to me, i hate when u can see the bg thru the render
-
yea, i think with the subzero sig, kemo was trying to make it look more like he was in the water. kemo youre definetly getting better. just keep at it.
My DevART
RATCHET is my bitch
Andrew says:
u ever stolen a bible?
Apathy says:
no
used the last two pages to roll a joint though
Andrew says:
wow
thats fucking hard core
^^HAHAHA, dm sucks XD
-
thanks for the feedback evryone but as i said it's 2-3 months old.
 Originally Posted by paparoksguitar
yea, i think with the subzero sig, kemo was trying to make it look more like he was in the water. kemo youre definetly getting better. just keep at it.
thanks PRG i'll try making a sig more often
 Originally Posted by BL4CKH4WK
the only things i dont like, is the text, but it seems like every1 has trouble with text so i wouldnt worry about it
and the opacity an the renders seems to low to me, i hate when u can see the bg thru the render 
what PRG said is what i was aiming for.
 Originally Posted by LokenII
Text doesn't really fit the sig, in my opinion. 
which sig LokenII?
 Originally Posted by Falc0re
the first one looks really good. as already said the text is improvable. (b.t.w. iīm a text noob aso i canīt give hints)
the background of the first one looks like tutorial-abuse but it looks good and thatīs what counts.
the sub-zero sig looks ok, but the blending looks strange to me. there is no realism in that. maybe you can improve that. and the blue of the background is very simple.
iīm not saying that i can do any better, but thatīs what i suggest. =)
i've been trying to follow some of Dark Method's text advice, but it seems i should try harder.
 Originally Posted by [PHXN] New001
The text is still very dull on both of them.
The new one is fine, but certainly not as good as your subzero one.
It seems just a little bland to me.
i'll try working on it
Fav:
 Originally Posted by kemo
Kemo_is_god: shutup sic.sick
sic.sick6: oh noes... i must shuttup! kemo's mighty servant hath spoken...
Similar Threads
-
By union-jack in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 2
Last Post: 12-22-2006, 04:43 PM
-
By shimano in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 7
Last Post: 12-21-2006, 05:13 PM
-
By Daywalker in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 6
Last Post: 12-08-2005, 05:50 PM
-
By CrazyGamer in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 4
Last Post: 08-01-2005, 01:58 AM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|