more abstract

[robgasm]

yeah, i amde another lol - im really trying to get good at abstract



or



i cant decide which is better - if you hadnt noticed its jsut the text thats different, i dont really want it to stand out those so i like the second..

[rapidx]

lol i'm trying to get better with brushing too.. :P Yea i think both are nice but the second one is better.. I dunno if its just me, :blink: but i cant see very clearly the abstract brushing.. try to make it a bit more visible or sth..!

[robgasm]

its ment to be that way

its ment to look like the sky at night, but i amde with abstract brushes you see - i like to make stuff with brushes rather than jsut do random things

[rapidx]

Then i think its really good for a sky in the night..!
Good Job!

[Illegalx17]

meh. too plain. again i could do that with about 3 brushes. you really need to work more on abstract brushings, cuz you can make things like this that are ok, but very simple and lack depth. i dont know if just hte sky at night is good enough to make a sig on cuz its not gonna have much depth. you did work nicely with the star brushes tho and i like the two colors. but just too simple for my liking.

[IndoSilver]

maybe you could find a midway point between too much and too little brushing, but in this case the simple brushing makes it look classy B)

[robgasm]

could someone pelase do a tuorial (preferably you illegal since you think you know so much about it) on adding depth to abstract cause everytime i do a sig now, some one (usually illegal) complains that it was done with 3 brushes and it has no depth - i really would liek to improve, so please - write a tut

[Illegalx17]

ok, i've only said that like twice. i know i can be harsh but its just me, plz dont get angry. im kinda like zekayem except nicer :P. depth is really quite hard to explain it, hxc designs explained it once really well but i donno where it is. its just kinda like lookin at it and seeing more than just a 2d sig, you really read into it a lot and theres more the more you look at it. on this sig i guess there is some depth on the right and stuff but the left needs work. argh its just hard to explain.

[2-intenze]

meh, its a bit girly :P rofl but not bad, it looks too basic i think but not bad if i said before. but this looks like a 2-minutes made sig if im wrong my conclusion says this sig sux :P i cant see much of the abstract brushing it looks more like kind of stretched clouds :blink: its not really bad but this isnt very good at all

6.3/10

[robgasm]

meh, im not too bothered if you think it looks girrly - and illegal, i know that you can be harsh and dont mind that but i only dont mind if people explain why something is bad - i know what depth is but i jsut dont know how to apply it to an abstract sig in the way that i do to a grunge sig