Wich one is best?

[soZanski]

(bit shiny text, maybe bg a bit to)



(totally shiny)



(normall)

Tell me wich is best if you want, and what you think about the overall sig.

[Minion V]

I would go with the third (normal) one. The first one looks a lot like the third, but the colors in the third one seem to be richer and not as faded. The second one was just to blury.

Overall I like the sig, but it feels almost like there's too much black empty space.

[imported_crazzzy]

i would go with the 2nd looks the cooloes imo

[Jefster]

Originally posted by Minion V@Aug 7 2005, 01:36 PM
I would go with the third (normal) one. The first one looks a lot like the third, but the colors in the third one seem to be richer and not as faded.* The second one was just to blury.

Overall I like the sig, but it feels almost like there's too much black empty space.

[snapback]66370[/snapback]

x2.

and what is with the current obsession for tiny fonts? They aren't always right for every sig. I'm seeing so many sigs lately with 30-50% dead space.

Work on the composition of your image. I suggest pushing the render to the left and extending the lighter brushwork right. then put a legible font on it.

[I.Kazuma]

i like the second one the best....it just looks better

[soZanski]

Originally posted by Jefster@Aug 7 2005, 02:56 PM
x2.

and what is with the current obsession for tiny fonts? They aren't always right for every sig. I'm seeing so many sigs lately with 30-50% dead space.

Work on the composition of your image. I suggest pushing the render to the left and extending the lighter brushwork right. then put a legible font on it.

[snapback]66382[/snapback]

im sorry, but i tottally dont agree with this, and im not gonna do it :P, MORE COMMENTS ARE HIGHLY APPRECIATED THOUGH!