starwarsness

[Marrklarr]

uhm i think this sig might suck but im gonna show it to u anyway...its kinda different

no brushing

[MasterDuckie]

What Filters did you use.. Awsome job... it is different..

[Quanz]

Wewt i like this... filters only are really nice... lol. Gj mang

[Death of a Clown]

Why do you include a description of how the signature was made in the signature itself? You should definitely remove that.

Other than that I like it. It's nice and bright and cheerful.

[-RockStaR]

wow, thats nice man.. i like the lighting

[shodan]

i think its cool, glossy *drools*

[Wiseson]

looks great man, excellent job.

[C K]

Originally posted by Death of a Clown@Aug 14 2005, 09:51 PM
Why do you include a description of how the signature was made in the signature itself? You should definitely remove that.

Other than that I like it. It's nice and bright and cheerful.

[snapback]69116[/snapback]

Really why post it in general? I'm going to start puting default brushing and displace fitler in all of my threads for now on I think. :P

As for the sig its um..something. In truth I don't really care for it. It just doesn't seem like that effect, though its an okay effect, is very fitting with that image. Plus the typo, though nicely done in presentation, doesn't work in color. I think it would look much better in a orange/red color. Eye drop from the background always works if you want the colors to match. Plus yes take out the filters thing at the bottom. Thats likes like naming an abstract sig "ABSTRACT"..we know...and probably don't care.

[Sobek]

Unique...looks pretty good, love the typo, but get rid of that FILTERS ONLY text, pointless shiz

Keep it up!

[Lumix]

Agreed with removing the text.. But I don't like the effect on the render.. Looks odd imo.. Maybe try diffrent layer options? I think bg looks vivid and nice.. But I think the star wars text could be improved.. Why would you bother with "STAR WarS"? Looks.. Random..