GFXVoid Graphic Design Forum

Remove Text Formatting
Loading...

» Online Users: 26,370

0 members and 26,370 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation

 > FAQ

» Stats

Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
Welcome to our newest member, Lekelindids
Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: PS art

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,440

    Default



    ok i made this for CGS, just to post something new.

    hmm this took under 2 hours to fully complete, its lacking i know but i didnt really ahve time to getr into lighting and shadowing and overall detail :9 sorry

    well tell me what you think gah i flattend the PSD file stupid me

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Over there.
    Posts
    1,201

    Default

    Fairly nice, needs more detail / postwork though .

    Keep it up .




  3. #3
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Posts
    20

    Default

    ^As he said more detail is needed. Also, probably just me, but I'm having trouble focusing on any one point other than the flower slightly. Lighting would SEVERLY improve this sig...

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    1,078

    Default

    Originally posted by Ghost@Feb 23 2006, 06:45 AM
    Lighting would SEVERLY improve this sig...
    [snapback]113563[/snapback]
    sig? its a digital painting... also, there is lighting in it. If you took the time to look at it, you might notice that the right side has a red glow and the left has a yellow/gold glow. Now, looking at the robot thing, you can clearly see gold being reflected off of it on its left side, and red on its right side. Look at the image and think a little bit more before you post criticism.

    As for what I think, I think it needs more depth. At the moment its paper thin. The lighting, as I've already described, is decent. I like it. I too feel that there needs to be more detail.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,891

    Default

    The robot and all of its other junkie parts on its right look super flat....

    would look a lot better if it, like Jack said, had more depth, and not look "paper thin".


  6. #6
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,440

    Default

    i agree with jack and spider.

    thanks for the comments guys :9

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    NSW, Australia
    Posts
    1,511

    Default

    looks low quality to me at the moment, needs more detail etc.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Glasgow, Scotland
    Posts
    2,824

    Default

    As far as composition goes, I think it would work better with the flower in the very centre, with more emphasis on the light coming from the flower, making it perhaps a more dominant light source.
    Also try making larger brushstrokes, with brushes on a higher opacity, this would help make adding detail alot easier.

    I agree that it could do with some more detail, perhaps zoom to about 400% and add scratches to the metal on the robot.
    Also, the haze around the edges of the piece would work better if they were a bit more subtle.

    Great idea though, and you've pulled it off well.
    I'd like to see a version of this from a different perspective, perhaps looking headlong on to the character, with the flower at the front, that way you could make it look almost like a movie still.

    Hope that helps,
    Good work!
    Seki

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Posts
    1,440

    Default

    thanks seki, yea i think that a diff perspective would look better just this this for multi surface lighting practice, if it camne out ok in the end that a plus but reall just did it for a quick sketch practice.

    ty all for the comments

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.1