Fathom

[Smiling Demon]

CnC plz guys

[.heKtik]

text looks pixely... and what is it

[BeaSt]

^^^^^^

[Einsturzende]

and what is it

I don't recall there ever being a necessity for a forum signature to be definable in terms of what it "is" and "isn't". In fact, I think believing so is very unprogressive and, overall, too linear.

Those that are unable to appreciate what they cannot comprehend (according to the laws of the "text+render+background" format) clearly have no grasp on the abstract, and furthermore, only enjoy the monotonous monstrocity of artistic stillness.




Anyway, I think the sig looks too painted in certain areas, but otherwise it's decent. Colors work nice, and it has a good "underwater" feeling, in a way.

[DChild]

Colors work nice, and it has a good "underwater" feeling, in a way.

Thats what i thought it looks as if your swimming to the surface, good job mate.

[.heKtik]

erm... speak english Ein

[Spluff]

erm... speak english Ein

He says art doesn't have to be 'something'. He thinks that limiting art to what is obviously a picture of something is boring. He also thinks that if people don't understand that, they don't know what abstract is and are therefore stuck looking at still picture - and can't see beyond that to the art.

[/rough translation]

I like it. TBH, I actually like it better with the text, it allows a break from how similar / repetative the rest of the image is (not that it's a bad thing, it just gives the eye something else to look at).

[Smiling Demon]

thanks guys.

@Hektik: It was done with sumdging. thats about it lol... was supposed to be abstract... kinda went for underwater feel with the colours.