0 members and 480 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
New Hero
@_@
Took me a while to make a new signature.
V.1 as JPEG

V.2 as PNG

As always, CnC much appreciated.
Last edited by TRUeLM; 11-03-2010 at 03:18 PM.
-
-
It's LQ, you should save any tags and such as .png to keep the images quality to the max..
Quess c+c is hard when you have to do it on a jpeg.. So will do it after I see the png?
-
LQ? lawl, I don't see what your talking about, but I'll humor you.
Anyways, upped the signature saved as .PNG.
-
 Originally Posted by TRUeLM
LQ? lawl, I don't see what your talking about, but I'll humor you.
Anyways, upped the signature saved as .PNG.
It is, that's his opinion if you're just going to say "LQ? lawl" then I don't really see the point in asking for cnc.
I also believe it's LQ and I think it needs more of a "wow" factor to it.
-
 Originally Posted by Joey x
It is, that's his opinion if you're just going to say "LQ? lawl" then I don't really see the point in asking for cnc.
Hmm...that made a lot of sense?
Anyways, if you read his post (which I'll presume you didn't) he stated that he would write cnc for it after I put up a copy of it in .png format.
Therefore, he provided no actual cnc. My response : lawl. I thought it was funny 
Moving on to you, You see this LQ as well, which is acceptable to me :P
any suggestions on how to add this "Wow" factor?
-
it is lq not going to like. it is a decent sig though. however like others said it lacks wow factor which is completely up to the artist figure out.

My Three Rules Of Making a Sig Flow, Lighting and Depth
-
The quality didn't really improve... Well whatever, the background and other c4dish effects don't really seem to blend with the render IMO. I like the Idea behind the text though, i love multiple lines
Thumbs up for the render, and you've created quite a nice flow for this tag so I'll say something nice about that..(I just did)
But seriously, the background stock doesn't match the colors, and I find that quite a waste because I believe it makes this sig less good.. Sorry for the sucky c&c
-
 Originally Posted by DR809
wow factor which is completely up to the artist figure out.
Bleh, looks like I'll have to figure this one out myself eh.
 Originally Posted by ΩOmega
The quality didn't really improve... Well whatever, the background and other c4dish effects don't really seem to blend with the render IMO. I like the Idea behind the text though, i love multiple lines 
Thumbs up for the render, and you've created quite a nice flow for this tag so I'll say something nice about that..(I just did)
But seriously, the background stock doesn't match the colors, and I find that quite a waste because I believe it makes this sig less good.. Sorry for the sucky c&c
I knew that, thats why I just posted in JPEG. Your CnC was not sucky 
It's not a render, it's a stock. The whole picture, so if the woman doesn't match the colors of the background, blame the photographer? I spent half the time trying to make the c4d's blend with the render, but that was fail I see. I'll try and fix it but...yeah. So, thanks guys!
Similar Threads
-
By Takken in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 9
Last Post: 06-19-2009, 03:09 PM
-
By BonesMa in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 6
Last Post: 01-13-2009, 02:10 PM
-
By BeaSt in forum Digital Art
Replies: 2
Last Post: 11-03-2007, 07:23 AM
-
By Virus™ in forum Digital Art
Replies: 7
Last Post: 01-08-2006, 04:19 AM
-
By Kyoushima in forum Digital Art
Replies: 6
Last Post: 11-08-2005, 05:21 PM
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|