0 members and 18,482 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
Yuffie Kisaragi


EDIT: VERSION 2.0
I feel like there's just something missing from this sig, but I can't put my finger on it. I tried playing with some fractals but I couldn't get it to look right.
CnC very welcome!
Last edited by Vyper316632; 12-23-2010 at 01:56 AM.
-
-
-
i would try less scan lines, maybe not every Sig should have those in it, less that's what u throw in to show it's your style ? but i like how you went smaller size as asked gj m8. You're getting there kiu, i would probably try make it Les sharp as well .
-
Thanks for the suggestions. I will work on it some more when I get home from work tonight 
My idea was for it to be very crisp and sharp, but I can probably tone down the sharpness of the background a bit.
Yeah, I was playing around with intensity on the lens flare trying to get to a good medium. I will play around with it more tonight and post a v3.0
As far as scanlines, I think it fits the overall image of this sig. I like the effect they create on the sharpened background. Once I finish adjusting the sharpness I will work on the opacity of the scanlines as well.
I will tone down the text, too. I'm going to try using a clipping mask instead of a gradient. Again, I will post the updated results later tonight, plus another sig I'll be making by request.
I'm amazed at how many requests I've gotten since starting up again. It keeps me busy
-
v2's a lot better . its over contrasted a tad imo
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|