0 members and 4,077 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation
» Stats
Members: 35,442
Threads: 103,075
Posts: 826,688
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
|
-
new stalker sig

does it need more c4d behind the render or not?
C&C
Last edited by LFC908; 01-23-2011 at 09:08 AM.
-
I would say, get rid of the current c4d, or add in quite a few more behind (and to the left of the tag).
I like what you have going on so far, good light source and depth. I'm just unsure which effects are yours and which ones are from the original stock
-
 Originally Posted by Eralebus
I would say, get rid of the current c4d, or add in quite a few more behind (and to the left of the tag).
I like what you have going on so far, good light source and depth. I'm just unsure which effects are yours and which ones are from the original stock
I agree, looks nice and clean, just lacking on the left side
Great work, kiu
-
Similar Threads
-
By LFC908 in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 2
Last Post: 01-09-2011, 06:48 PM
-
By keden in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 5
Last Post: 02-23-2010, 05:34 AM
-
By SparryGfx in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 3
Last Post: 09-03-2009, 09:05 PM
-
By cC.ShorterGFX in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 7
Last Post: 08-06-2009, 10:50 PM
-
By Juicy in forum Sigs & Manips
Replies: 7
Last Post: 08-28-2005, 01:12 AM
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules
|