great bg, nice ,sharp render. but the text, you spent alot of time with the rest of the sig, i can tell, you should spend more time looking for a bettere text for that nice sig
08-22-2005, 10:38 PM
Mr Toasty
lmao, your off ur pixel stretch phase? anyway, i really like it, and it looks like theres something on the right (theres not right? o.O). only CnC is text (always the text with you freak :P) anyway, keep up the good-non-pixel-stretching-work! :lol:
08-23-2005, 12:05 AM
Freak
3 out of 43 views replied? Come on people...I need CnC. Thanks!!
08-23-2005, 12:16 AM
undertone
meh, doesn really float my boat sorry.
and i like it more unblended, seems like you went overboard on the blending.
maybe its the text, maybe its the bg, just dont like this style of signature.
08-23-2005, 12:54 AM
Elleray
if your going to fix it, fix what looks bad, not what looks good :)
08-23-2005, 02:30 AM
Hunter
The sig looks great, but the text is very plain. IMO the third one is the best out of them. The 2nd render doesn't look the best.
08-23-2005, 05:49 AM
RAHTING
Imo the 3rd one is the best, i think you need to find a new font to go with the rest of the sig but apart from that i like it a lot. GJ :)
08-23-2005, 06:50 AM
ANtidote
Its all about what you like. After all, arent you the one that will use it?
I dont think there is anything wrong i like the first one better and maybe add a bit of glow to the text but its awesome.
GJ again man.