Operation Iraq Liberation

Printable View

02-01-2006, 10:41 PM
jinx

So do you guys think we are just there for oil?
operation iraq liberation
oil
:D
02-03-2006, 12:30 PM
Ben

I think WE as in UK are there because Tony Blair enjoy anal sex with cowboy man, bushy.
02-03-2006, 01:32 PM
Flip

Quote:

Originally posted by PLaYbOi@Yesterday, 10:41 PM
So do you guys think we are just there for oil?
operation iraq liberation
oil
:D

[snapback]150127[/snapback]

thats a great ANTI-FLAG song. any ways i think were def there for oil no question about it. the first oil company to get a deal with the US once we got in there was a company DICK is chairman of! what a bunch of fucking greed assholes.
02-03-2006, 01:48 PM
Dick

sure theyre there for OIL ....
02-03-2006, 02:37 PM
jinx

lol i dident take that from any song.... but i still didn't make it up myself :(
02-05-2006, 03:45 AM
CrazyGamer

U wanna know something really funny. If 9/11 happened again tommorow you would all be screaming to nuke the fucking middle east off the fucking planet. Love how people have no memory.
02-05-2006, 01:01 PM
Flip

Quote:

Originally posted by CrazyGamer@9 Hours Ago
U wanna know something really funny. If 9/11 happened again tommorow you would all be screaming to nuke the fucking middle east off the fucking planet. Love how people have no memory.

[snapback]151025[/snapback]

um last time i checked it's not all the middle east that want to bomb us and 2nd I def wouldn't want to just invade a country that didn't do anything in the first place. that would be like after we dropped the bomb in WW2 on Japan, Japan then attacking Mexico or Cannada. this war doesn't make sense plan and simple.
02-05-2006, 03:12 PM
WickeD

If we wanted oil that bad why would we not have invaded Saudi Arabia?
02-05-2006, 03:17 PM
saben

First, there was the whole thing about sadam and his nukes. We found out that he had none, but continued because he was a very bad guy. He would imprision random people off the street and torture them for fun. And i agree with crazy. Although it wasn't specifically sadam that had anything to do with the 9/11 bombings, but he does have ties in with terrorist networks.
02-05-2006, 04:29 PM
Flip

Quote:

Originally posted by saben@1 Hour Ago
First, there was the whole thing about sadam and his nukes. We found out that he had none, but continued because he was a very bad guy. He would imprision random people off the street and torture them for fun. And i agree with crazy. Although it wasn't specifically sadam that had anything to do with the 9/11 bombings, but he does have ties in with terrorist networks.

[snapback]151175[/snapback]

um he has ZERO ties to the terrorist.(click on itProof) yes he was a awful person but who are we to tell people how to run their country. there is the same if not worse heads of states in Africa yet we don't go in and bomb the shit out of them. You people don't get it. How would you feel if someone BOMBED your house and killed all of your family for no reason. i think you would be pretty pissed too. i talked to a solider that was over in Iraq and he said that most of the people in Iraq don't see a need to be there. and infact before he left after his training he was told by his Trial Sarg. one thing and that was " Your not a hero to the people of Iraq so don't think you will be. your over there for one reason and one reason only to Protect oil feilds. you signed a form saying you would do what is asked of you so you can't say you don't want to go over and do that." Enough said