Re-desingned it from a previous logo. =)
http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/120...amslogo4pt.jpg
Printable View
Re-desingned it from a previous logo. =)
http://img66.imageshack.us/img66/120...amslogo4pt.jpg
Mmmm...no. Too dull. And why is it in the design and interfaces section perchance?
P.S. No offense bfg. Nice to see you again :).
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(weasel @ Jun 23 2006, 06:28 PM) [snapback]175468[/snapback]</div>He was redoing someone elses logo. he did a good job on revamping it without changing how it looked.Quote:
Mmmm...no. Too dull. And why is it in the design and interfaces section perchance?
[/b]
And it's in this section because logo's fall under Design. I really have no clue why interface is listed with design, when we switch to VBullletin the mod staff is going to do some serious rethinking about our forum titles.
Haha yeah, that was my crappy logo :) Yeah, Thanks for the backup 43 :P
