http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b3...e-hathaway.jpg
Im so happy with the one !
Comments plz
H O T Anne Hathaway
Printable View
-
09-10-2006, 03:11 PMdanielsasoH O T Anne Hathaway
-
09-10-2006, 03:16 PMforever.lost
the hearts, squares and what not other shapes over power the render there the first thing you look at you don't really get the main idea of the sig (being the render) because your eyes are drawn away to so many diffrent places right away try lightening the shape brushes up a bit so there less destrating
-
09-10-2006, 04:09 PMHorus
i think its very pretty, good job
-
09-10-2006, 05:55 PMInked
yeah , it looks pretty damn sweet. keep it up!
-
09-10-2006, 07:27 PMjeebin
i really like it
tut plz?
lol -
09-10-2006, 09:28 PMBlitz
Lol, yeah, I second that. I agree though tone down the hearts just a bit. GREAT work though.
-
09-11-2006, 12:48 AMNightfire
Looks great, not into the sun brush near your text, but I think that's only cuz I had a problem with a styleXP program that had that logo lol.
Anyway, while it seems to not have that much brushing, the brushing that is done looks good. Also the hearts and checkered colored background was a great idea and what I like most about this.
While I do agree with forever.lost about them drawing attention away from you render, I would sharpen or maybe darken her than lighten the designs.
Nice work. -
09-11-2006, 09:07 AMdanielsasono one said that the render was the main focus pointQuote:
Originally Posted by forever.lost
-
09-11-2006, 01:37 PMJeffRight, but it generally is the case unless the sig's radically different from the norm, and yours isn't. Best to lighten everything except the stock, maybe sharpen that if it looks good. The only major problem with this sig is, as already stated, is the fact that there is no focus point right now. Other than that though, good job. Love the text, good to see the matching colors.Quote:
Originally Posted by danielsaso
-
09-12-2006, 08:16 AMdragoneyeThe signature says it is...Quote:
Originally Posted by danielsaso
