hi, thx for comments. iīm still pretty noobish and want to improve.
http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?i...irybluevr9.png
http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/5655/ronaldohp6.png
http://img245.imageshack.us/my.php?i...irycopyqz6.jpg
Printable View
hi, thx for comments. iīm still pretty noobish and want to improve.
http://img340.imageshack.us/my.php?i...irybluevr9.png
http://img400.imageshack.us/img400/5655/ronaldohp6.png
http://img245.imageshack.us/my.php?i...irycopyqz6.jpg
The first one is a little, Uh sketchy? The stock kindof looks like pornography.
The second one the text needs to be fixed, but besides that I like how the render fits.
The third one is a little monotoned, and I think it could be a better quality stock.
ok. the first one used a erotic stock. so youīre right :D but i donīt think itīs too offensive.
yes the text is too simple on the second one. you know....once i have all finished i am sloppy in the end. the third one used a stock i shot myself. it wasnīt in a good lighting condition so the noise is visible. but i didnīt want to make it look blurry so i decided to leave the details untouched.
I think the text on the second one could use some modification, ie a bit of a grunge-smudge overlay. Other than that, it's quite good. However, the stock on that one is a bit strange (something like luminosity, it seems)... it doesn't look too good that way imo.
-konfusion
yes i get the point. i am quite happy with the look of the stock there, but the soft pink-shading should not have happened like that. thatīs the problem with the color "red". you canīt light it without producing pink. :mad: