starcraft trooper

made this a while back (2-3 months) but didn't have time to post it. CnC please.

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p...ttrooperv2.png

oh and i fixed the text on my subzero sig. i know it took a while but i didn't have anytime. Cnc
v1

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p...subzerosig.png

v2

http://i130.photobucket.com/albums/p...ms/subzero.png

The text is still very dull on both of them.

The new one is fine, but certainly not as good as your subzero one.
It seems just a little bland to me.

the first one looks really good. as already said the text is improvable. (b.t.w. i´m a text noob aso i can´t give hints)
the background of the first one looks like tutorial-abuse but it looks good and that´s what counts.

the sub-zero sig looks ok, but the blending looks strange to me. there is no realism in that. maybe you can improve that. and the blue of the background is very simple.

i´m not saying that i can do any better, but that´s what i suggest. =)

Text doesn't really fit the sig, in my opinion. :)

the only things i dont like, is the text, but it seems like every1 has trouble with text so i wouldnt worry about it

and the opacity an the renders seems to low to me, i hate when u can see the bg thru the render :p

yea, i think with the subzero sig, kemo was trying to make it look more like he was in the water. kemo youre definetly getting better. just keep at it.

thanks for the feedback evryone but as i said it's 2-3 months old.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by paparoksguitar

yea, i think with the subzero sig, kemo was trying to make it look more like he was in the water. kemo youre definetly getting better. just keep at it.

---

thanks PRG i'll try making a sig more often

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by BL4CKH4WK

the only things i dont like, is the text, but it seems like every1 has trouble with text so i wouldnt worry about it

and the opacity an the renders seems to low to me, i hate when u can see the bg thru the render :p

---

what PRG said is what i was aiming for.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by LokenII

Text doesn't really fit the sig, in my opinion. :)

---

which sig LokenII?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Falc0re

the first one looks really good. as already said the text is improvable. (b.t.w. i´m a text noob aso i can´t give hints)
the background of the first one looks like tutorial-abuse but it looks good and that´s what counts.

the sub-zero sig looks ok, but the blending looks strange to me. there is no realism in that. maybe you can improve that. and the blue of the background is very simple.

i´m not saying that i can do any better, but that´s what i suggest. =)

---

i've been trying to follow some of Dark Method's text advice, but it seems i should try harder.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by [PHXN] New001

The text is still very dull on both of them.

The new one is fine, but certainly not as good as your subzero one.
It seems just a little bland to me.

---

i'll try working on it