Instead of vector brushes? It'd seem a lot more convenient to have your vector shapes be compatible with a tool that uses paths instead of the brush.
*demands more .chs files and less .abr files* >_>
Printable View
Instead of vector brushes? It'd seem a lot more convenient to have your vector shapes be compatible with a tool that uses paths instead of the brush.
*demands more .chs files and less .abr files* >_>
They don't know how ;) Mind linking a tutorial or something?
I could make one.
Really all you have to do is make the vector shape with the pen tool, and then go to define custom shape, which is right next to define custom brush.
Thats not hard at all :P lol thanks
Hint http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/18982990/ /hintQuote:
Originally posted by Krazy@Jun 3 2005, 06:14 AM
They don't know how ;) Mind linking a tutorial or something?
[snapback]35073[/snapback]
So that's the reason I've seen those signatures so often...Quote:
Originally posted by .Ro0k!e^@Jun 3 2005, 01:37 AM
Hint* http://www.deviantart.com/deviation/18982990/ /hint
[snapback]35136[/snapback]
Full signature tutorials are the bane of the graphics community. They kill originality.
Tis true... but its not the tut makers that are the blame really. Its the people who IMMITATE the tut and then copy the style in their next 10 sigs
Yes, indeed.
That's what I used to do back in my abstract filter sig days anyway.
2 bad you guys have a point..
How many people have coppied this?..
I made this up.. never have seen it b4 ..now again everyone is copying it..
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y11/ro0kie/Funny.jpg
This sig I had some inspiration from other guys.. but some1 made a tut bout it and now like half cx has the almost same sig.
http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y11/ro0kie/Winner.jpg
rookie if your trying to be original dont make tuts on your style :P lol
