V1:
http://img234.imageshack.us/img234/2386/edcg3.png
V2:
http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/1681/eddz9.png
V3:
http://img87.imageshack.us/img87/8033/ed1fz8.png
I was going for a soft and soothing small canvas design, I was also focusing on the interaction between the stock and it's surroundings. Looks a lot better on a dark skin.
toot toot
Printable View
-
10-30-2006, 08:49 PMmyst
-
10-30-2006, 09:52 PMstatic
v3 ftw
-
10-31-2006, 12:44 AMSpid3r
looks like render + smudge + paste + something blurry on top.
I don't like this one.
Great stock. -
10-31-2006, 06:23 AMmystJust because it looks like it doesn't mean it actually is it... you should try looking at the overall appeal of something, not looking how it was made. But I understand, thank you.Quote:
looks like render + smudge + paste + something blurry on top.
I don't like this one.
Great stock.
[/b]
-
10-31-2006, 07:46 AMKyoushima
Not liking it too much tbh, don't know why.. but it's alright! :)
-
11-04-2006, 09:06 PMSpid3rThat's exactly what I said. I looks like it. I never said "this is what you did".Quote:
Just because it looks like it doesn't mean it actually is it...
[/b]
Giving my example was just to show how I felt about it's appeal: uninteresting
Glad you understand.
thanks. -
11-25-2006, 06:10 PMelektrikgfx
It looks pretty shitty to be honest.
-
11-25-2006, 06:21 PMspace-time
^You're wondering why you were hated?
Anyway, not really liking the effects in the background. I think v3's the best though. It's weird how you flip it around and it changes the whole feel of it. They're not bad though.
EDIT: Oh wow, didn't know this was old. -
11-25-2006, 06:21 PMSpluff
[EDIT- Not applicable now I've read something else].
-
11-25-2006, 06:24 PMmystAhh yes, going back to your old ways. We all know you didn't change.Quote:
Originally Posted by elektrikgfx
