http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y87...le/Fathom1.png
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y87...le/Fathom2.png
http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y87...le/Fathom3.png
CnC plz guys
Printable View
text looks pixely... and what is it
^^^^^^
I don't recall there ever being a necessity for a forum signature to be definable in terms of what it "is" and "isn't". In fact, I think believing so is very unprogressive and, overall, too linear.
Those that are unable to appreciate what they cannot comprehend (according to the laws of the "text+render+background" format) clearly have no grasp on the abstract, and furthermore, only enjoy the monotonous monstrocity of artistic stillness.
Anyway, I think the sig looks too painted in certain areas, but otherwise it's decent. Colors work nice, and it has a good "underwater" feeling, in a way.
erm... speak english Ein
He says art doesn't have to be 'something'. He thinks that limiting art to what is obviously a picture of something is boring. He also thinks that if people don't understand that, they don't know what abstract is and are therefore stuck looking at still picture - and can't see beyond that to the art.
[/rough translation]
I like it. TBH, I actually like it better with the text, it allows a break from how similar / repetative the rest of the image is (not that it's a bad thing, it just gives the eye something else to look at).
thanks guys.
@Hektik: It was done with sumdging. thats about it lol... was supposed to be abstract... kinda went for underwater feel with the colours.