Take your time

just made a random siggie:)

http://i39.tinypic.com/34g2dcy.jpg

B/w
http://i39.tinypic.com/2u5ux4o.jpg

CnC?

Okay, the blurred BG is alright, brings out the render i suppose.
THe lighting is quite good actually.
I think the sig is too high.
The effects are subtle, but neat. Maybe a bit more could have been done, but its nice atm.
Text is okayy. But i wouldn't choose 2 similar fonts, I would change the second text to something different, makes it more interesting.
I prefer V1, but I think it could be gradient mapped a bit more, to bring all the colours together.

Cute + Simple overall.

BG is OVER blurred :S the text is way to simple be abit more creative with it or just have no text lol :) i do like how the blurriness (cant spell or is it even a WORD!) brings out the focal but i would still like to see the BG lol :) + i love the effects maybe abit more of the right effects on the left would look awesome and the downfall of this tag IMO is the yellow lighting :S there is no yellow on the tag except that, yeah maybe it adds more colour but try and keep to a certain colour scheme :S :D

Overall is a nice simple looking tag that needs a couple of improvments :D

BG needs only a tad blurring. Try setting layer opacity to like what, 65%. It works. Like the colours you used though it seems to be a bit random. Text a bit lame but otherwise it passes. Like the V1 better.

http://www.gfxvoid.com/forums/showthread.php?t=53271

Thx guys, but why do you link your time sig?:/

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by flatty

Thx guys, but why do you link your time sig?:/

---

Yeah that seemed a little rude to do in someone else's sig thread.

But anyways, I agree with the background being a little overblurred. The text is plain but that's just my opinion. I probably would have used a curlier girly text there instead. Since the details are very plain in the signature, it wouldn't hurt to have a more elaborate font, you know what I mean?

Yeah i got it;)