http://i456.photobucket.com/albums/q...ssigcopy-1.png
http://i456.photobucket.com/albums/q...-WSOTWcopy.png
CnC them : D
My latest two signatures.
Printable View
-
10-30-2009, 07:54 AMspidey5443My latest two signatures.
-
10-30-2009, 09:23 AMScrib
Lookin good , I like your style;)
-
10-30-2009, 09:23 AMTakken
There is some level of depth in the sigs but its not well adjusted IMO. The text needs working on in both sigs and the flow is abrupt. Also, both, especially the first are mono.
Plain, default texts are the best. -
10-30-2009, 12:05 PMspidey5443Thnx : DQuote:
Originally Posted by iScribble.
What do you mean by mono? :PQuote:
Originally Posted by Takken
-
10-30-2009, 12:12 PMFur
Well the first one is monotond but it loos good..he means just the same color. Honestly the depth on both of them are good. Only thing wrong with the bottom one is the text is alittle too strong, but the text looks good just need to blend it in. Love the first one tho. Very nice work kep it up.
-
10-30-2009, 03:32 PMEpiph
loving the first one...though, the text kinda kills it..
2nd one is good, but the lighting in the back is too strong, IMO, and the text is a bit too noticible as well.. -
10-31-2009, 06:12 AMspidey5443oh! I get it! Thnx for clearing that up. And thnx for the comment. : D Yea, I was trying to do something new with text and I endedup making it tooo much noticeable xDQuote:
Originally Posted by Fur
ah! hmm can you tell me how is the text killing it, I mean should I make it strong or blur it more??Quote:
Originally Posted by Epiph
hehe I tried to lower the lightening with some black soft brush but didn't worked xD
Thnx for the comment! : D
