In desperate need of honest oppinions #2

Greetings,

As some of you know I head a battle team on another forum for a mobile / pc based chat client. The 3 teams are such : 2 x teams run by board admins, 1 x team run by user (Me).. So there is a bit of bias on the board

I need some honest answers here as to which sig is best please if you do not want to comment just leave an answer

sig 1:
http://lookpic.com/i/466/WuhQmw2.gif

sig 2:
http://i62.photobucket.com/albums/h8.../XOKBattle.png

just say 1 or 2

thanks
_________

My apologies for the other post not working

again... sig one dosnt show

Please allow time to load this is a 500 kb sig if you can not see it but see my sig they are the same thing
Uploaded to different server
Sig 1:
http://i44.tinypic.com/k4c7io.jpg

If i where to give my honest opinion, i would say the second sig is the better one.

yep agree with sparda

Neither one of them are that great to be honest.

Any kind of animated sig will always lose, they're just not popular anymore and are considered to be a 'noob' sig.

and the second one just looks like a render placed on a topazed background.

If I had to choose, I'd go with the second one, just cause it's more appealing then the first.

i think the problem with alot of animated signatures is that the animation takes away to much from the main vocal point.
instead of adding something it often times just ends up distracting from the rest.

My Honest Opinion
Is 2
The depth is freakin amazing and i like the colors:)

sig 1 gmv. i don't know why that kind of style is considered noobish. it in all probability took a lot more time and effort to make, then a topaz bg and smudged c4d's/renders.

sig 2