http://i29.tinypic.com/161du2q.jpg
Here is my new tag. Hope you like it.
Cnc,
-Kylian
Printable View
http://i29.tinypic.com/161du2q.jpg
Here is my new tag. Hope you like it.
Cnc,
-Kylian
bumb
Very nice, but I think you need to work on depth ( for the right side) and blurring out some c4ds on the right.
Other than that, nice flow and I like what you did with the splatter.
http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/4548/stylev2.jpg
V2 beter depth i think.
IMO too big... the lightning is really off, the splatter isnt really used correctly there, left part is a bit too empty and text needs some work but the thing that really killed it for me was the border (suggest to only use black or white border or not even use border)... anyway try using tuts to help u out bro... KIU
Don't bump sigs. People will see them in time.
Really? And who says older chicks don't look good? I personally think if you're critiquing the stock they used, then you're not really doing the artist any good. I'm a firm believer in if you didn't make it don't use it, but everyone breaks that rule nowadays since you can't design anything without plagiarizing a dozen people on accident, but at least offer meaningful critique (in terms of your subject matter). I guess my point is, it shouldn't matter what stock he chooses to use, it's how well the surrounding elements coincide with it.Quote:
get a hotter.. younger chick:)
To go along with that, you're also critiquing with a closed mind. "hot young chicks" might be a design fad. Maybe one day they will go out of style, and older chicks will reign supreme. I don't care either way, but it shouldn't matter what's in or out these days. As an artist you really can't choose what's cool today. At least not with signatures, since who the hell knows what's cool now with signatures anyway. It's just not very effective or productive critique.
Just my 2 cents.