New Hero

Printable View

11-02-2010, 03:21 PM
TRUeLM

New Hero

@_@

Took me a while to make a new signature.

V.1 as JPEG
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/a...mo/NEWHERO.jpg

V.2 as PNG
http://i973.photobucket.com/albums/a...titled-1-1.png

As always, CnC much appreciated.
11-03-2010, 02:59 PM
ROFL-Copter

nice
11-03-2010, 03:03 PM
ΩOmega

It's LQ, you should save any tags and such as .png to keep the images quality to the max..
Quess c+c is hard when you have to do it on a jpeg.. So will do it after I see the png?
11-03-2010, 03:19 PM
TRUeLM

LQ? lawl, I don't see what your talking about, but I'll humor you.

Anyways, upped the signature saved as .PNG.
11-03-2010, 04:27 PM
Derosion

Quote:

Originally Posted by TRUeLM

LQ? lawl, I don't see what your talking about, but I'll humor you.

Anyways, upped the signature saved as .PNG.

It is, that's his opinion if you're just going to say "LQ? lawl" then I don't really see the point in asking for cnc.

I also believe it's LQ and I think it needs more of a "wow" factor to it.
11-03-2010, 05:12 PM
TRUeLM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Joey x

It is, that's his opinion if you're just going to say "LQ? lawl" then I don't really see the point in asking for cnc.

Hmm...that made a lot of sense?

Anyways, if you read his post (which I'll presume you didn't) he stated that he would write cnc for it after I put up a copy of it in .png format.
Therefore, he provided no actual cnc. My response : lawl. I thought it was funny :D

Moving on to you, You see this LQ as well, which is acceptable to me :P
any suggestions on how to add this "Wow" factor?
11-03-2010, 05:16 PM
DR809

it is lq not going to like. it is a decent sig though. however like others said it lacks wow factor which is completely up to the artist figure out.
11-03-2010, 06:38 PM
ΩOmega

The quality didn't really improve... Well whatever, the background and other c4dish effects don't really seem to blend with the render IMO. I like the Idea behind the text though, i love multiple lines:)
Thumbs up for the render, and you've created quite a nice flow for this tag so I'll say something nice about that..(I just did)
But seriously, the background stock doesn't match the colors, and I find that quite a waste because I believe it makes this sig less good.. Sorry for the sucky c&c
11-03-2010, 07:33 PM
TRUeLM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DR809

wow factor which is completely up to the artist figure out.

Bleh, looks like I'll have to figure this one out myself eh.

Quote:

Originally Posted by ΩOmega

The quality didn't really improve... Well whatever, the background and other c4dish effects don't really seem to blend with the render IMO. I like the Idea behind the text though, i love multiple lines:)
Thumbs up for the render, and you've created quite a nice flow for this tag so I'll say something nice about that..(I just did)
But seriously, the background stock doesn't match the colors, and I find that quite a waste because I believe it makes this sig less good.. Sorry for the sucky c&c

I knew that, thats why I just posted in JPEG. Your CnC was not sucky :D
It's not a render, it's a stock. The whole picture, so if the woman doesn't match the colors of the background, blame the photographer? I spent half the time trying to make the c4d's blend with the render, but that was fail I see. I'll try and fix it but...yeah. So, thanks guys!