I feel like there's just something missing from this sig, but I can't put my finger on it. I tried playing with some fractals but I couldn't get it to look right.
CnC very welcome!
12-23-2010, 01:56 AM
Vyper316632
Update: Version 2.0
12-23-2010, 10:44 AM
Ebrithil
V2 is nicer, but the bright light there takes away from the focal, as does the text, you seem to pay too much attention to the text, you should make the sig and then fit the text in, just to me it seems you're making the sig around the text... if you know what i mean? :)
Also, the render doesn't fit imo, try adding a gradient map or something? :)
Still pretty cool though, kiu.
12-23-2010, 11:51 AM
sirenzo
i would try less scan lines, maybe not every Sig should have those in it, less that's what u throw in to show it's your style ? but i like how you went smaller size as asked gj m8. You're getting there kiu, i would probably try make it Les sharp as well .
12-23-2010, 12:12 PM
Vyper316632
Thanks for the suggestions. I will work on it some more when I get home from work tonight :)
My idea was for it to be very crisp and sharp, but I can probably tone down the sharpness of the background a bit.
Yeah, I was playing around with intensity on the lens flare trying to get to a good medium. I will play around with it more tonight and post a v3.0
As far as scanlines, I think it fits the overall image of this sig. I like the effect they create on the sharpened background. Once I finish adjusting the sharpness I will work on the opacity of the scanlines as well.
I will tone down the text, too. I'm going to try using a clipping mask instead of a gradient. Again, I will post the updated results later tonight, plus another sig I'll be making by request.
I'm amazed at how many requests I've gotten since starting up again. It keeps me busy :D
12-23-2010, 12:16 PM
Emsee
v2's a lot better :D. its over contrasted a tad imo