V1
http://fc01.deviantart.net/fs71/f/20...xx-d3aar0k.png
V2
http://img38.imageshack.us/img38/4716/future2j.png
V3
http://img3.imageshack.us/img3/4306/future3j.png
Printable View
The color pretty much kills the entire sig. Remove the pink monotone and it will look way better.
Bro, what's the point in telling you the underconrasted look DOES NOT work all the time?
You don't even consider the criticism, so that's probably why you barely get any.
Geez, how big must titties be?
As Derosion says: Your focal doesn't stand out enough. And also I think that your effects don't "work" together. If you group them more together it might..
I think v2 could be really good if there was some more contrast added to it
I like version 3 the best, V2 is okay also. It's not a bad tag, I like the smudging(?) you did with it. Keep it up.
It seems like there is a black layer with lowered opacity on the whole thing. It's too dark.
Version 2 or 3 is the best with the gradient maps you've picked. Maybe your monitor is set on really high contrast so this sig looks good but it looks really washed out on my screen and could use a curves or levels adjustment layer. Just to add some depth between the dark and light. Good sig composition and lighting.