Environmental Pollution.

http://shadowness.com/file/item4/101691/image.jpg

Interesting concept. Aesthetically I have a few complaints...
The focal you've created doesnt make any sense. The mountain on the left is in focus and half of the right one isn't, even though its at a closer distance. The sky is over sharpened and the text doesn't match the focus of the rest of the scene (the ground around it is blurred but the text is in focus). Fix those few issues and you've got yourself a good piece :)

Interesting concept indeed. But it's oversharpened which makes it kinda lq. The text is out of place it doesn't really belong there. Good job mate! Keep it up!

some of the many reasons why I come to this site.

the over sharpening is part of the style... I will find an example at slash three for you.

The text I could probably move back, but it would be even more out of place if I moved it back, and I am not gonna make it smaller.

The Mountains in the background are not out of focused.. its the same pictures.. unless the photographer had a crazy rolling blur lens... do they make those? Thats impossible.. What you are seeing at the gradual shadows of the mountain from its form, the mountain on the left doesn't have this form, seems to me its more rolling flat.

here is the style that I am referring to.
http://www.depthcore.com/img/richcon..._1920x1200.jpg

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by IVI+

some of the many reasons why I come to this site.

---

Like?

you can view this style.. a long with the artist's work at diftype.com... its not LQ actually.. what you consider to be LQ is considered highly prized textures and grains, that a lot of artists approve of ( traditional as well ) texture ( this includes sharpening, and as well as different textures ) is part of this particular style.

I like coming to this site, because I find it interesting. Peoples comments that is. Its different from site to site. But this site is particularly interesting. Like I said one of the many reasons I come here.

This is actually like the 3rd remake? The first and second had a couple issues with the text again, misspelled a few things, and then I added in the wrong colors.

I get it. Yet I still think it would look better if you only kept the sharpness of the focal.

alright. I will look into changing it! Thanks.

Over sharpness may be your "style" and that is fair enough, but personally I dont like it. It is important that any art you create, you expect criticism... at the end of the day the most important thing of any kind of creative industry is how the product you create is received. People may disagree with your methods now, but you never know it could be a trend in the future. Vincent Van Gough wasn't appreciated until after he died, and now he's one of the artistic greats. My criticism may not appear to agree with your style, but at the end of the day opinion is just that.