Photobucket and imageshack, are both poor image hosts. Please find a different host. They are slow and frequently make broken links. Thank you for you cooperation.
lolz ive never had any problems with imageshack. :huh:
.... so im not going to change
07-06-2005, 11:14 AM
-Kanji-
yeah sry bfg...ive had photobucket for too long and am not gonna change..ive never had a problem with it, so until i do, i cant change bud :huh: its my gallery after all.
07-06-2005, 11:19 AM
Ben
im an imageshack man
07-06-2005, 11:26 AM
ROTD
"xs.to pwnz0rz you" ^_^ thats my saying
07-06-2005, 12:05 PM
katgirl21
are you kidding me? imageshack is ja ownage!
07-06-2005, 12:32 PM
Samuel
Sorry but no. Imageshack is causingmany broken links. It also very slow and slows down the board when people try to surf the boards. And dont let me get started on photo bucket...... they are the worst image host ever.
07-06-2005, 01:12 PM
Deadloader
yes bfg, is right if you check most of my images they're imageshack and it's starting to suck i can't log into my portfolio and i loose all my images, photobucket has low bandwidth allowance although states unlimited... the amount of time i hear people bumming from photobucket then when i go to their sites/images/profiles for blogs... their images all have sorry the user is at bandwidth capacity xs.to is one of the best in my opinion and imageshack is a whore..... hahah but right now most ISPs are being capped and so image hosting is being cut short for most servers... try using other image hosting sites i'm sure one will come to your needs if you're too credulous to see photobucket suck, xs.to for teh win ^_^
07-06-2005, 03:49 PM
robgasm
yeah photobucket sux, bandwidth, and image shack sux, cos of the pics not showing
use:
pix7 (recommended)
xs.to (heard its good)
7 d //es.co//m/upload (if its big) (with no spaces or / before the /upload)