That makes sense. I can understand that getting a console is much cheaper then upgrading a PC (Well who knows with the next war on the breach).
Printable View
That makes sense. I can understand that getting a console is much cheaper then upgrading a PC (Well who knows with the next war on the breach).
Quote:
Originally posted by ZeekUnreloaded@Sep 12 2005, 02:17 PM
Sony seems to have a grasps over most RPG companies as you see most well known RPGs are released on their systems.* Xbox strictly relies on its power.* The only exclusive game XBox has to offer that got a stir out of anyone is Halo.
It is true that the Xbox is more powerful then the PS2.* But power means nothing in the world of video gaming (Except for those who are clueless to what a good game is).* PS2, as well as GameCube, produced games that provided not only better gameplay aspects but a better experience.
As it's looking the Xbox 360 is probably going to bomb.* Alot of the games are 3rd party produced and will probably be released on multiple platforms (when it comes to FPS's i'd rather have it on my computer). The problem I have with the PS3 and the Xbox360 is that they are going to practically be the same machine.* Just different games and feels.* Looking at the specs of the upcoming PS3 as opposed to the Xbox360, Sony is going to dominate in ever aspect.
One of the reasons i'm going to stick around with the Nintendo Revolution is because they're camp is acting as if they're going to provide something different.* Of course i'll own a ps3, but the Revolution seems as if it's going to give me something more that the other systems will not offer in aspects of gaming.* I mean come on now, it's Nintendo (Comments like this usually get flamed).* The games that Shigeru Miyamoto produce are most times games that are forever rememberable.
I prefer not to dive into system wars.* In nearly all cases the person defending their preferable machine will never change opinion or attitude towards the others.
[snapback]78134[/snapback]
erm does game of the year : knights of the old republic ring a bell? in addition.. fable, jade empire, knights of the old republic 2 were all badass. not to mention that final fantasy is coming to the 360 as well. so i wouldn't say that.
in addition, good games is you opinion. however, specs are not, they are cold hard facts. so when saying one system is inferior to another, say the xbox to the ps2, you are simply stating your opinion, not a fact.
in my opinion, as i have said numerous times, i LOVE xbox games, and there are also a lot of ps2 games i love. by saying the xbox has no good games other than halo you either are very ignorant or just have very strict tastes/expectations for games. i personally hated halo 2 thank you very much btw
also zeke, hate to tell you (well.. not really)
the 360 is more powerful than the ps3 in almost every respect. if you would like the proof i am more than willing to show you
Knights of the Old Republic was also a PC release (I won't lie it was a good game.) Don't forget Fable was considered a big disappointment. It didn't deliver all that was promised. I never played Jade Empire so i'm not one to judge.
As to the Final Fantasy comment, thats only speculation. As of right now no FF titles are set for any Xbox release. Square Enix stated that its a possibility for a future release on another console but it also stated as long as Sony remains on top it will not change it's stance. Square says it wants to keep it's FF series on the most dominate console. Although i'm sure Square will release some of their other titles now on Xbox.
When I talked about Xbox games I mentioned Halo because it's one of the only good games thats exclusive to the system, most others: Splinter Cell, etc are multiplatform releases.
When I was referring to power I was talking about the cell processor (Which is amazing) and the RSX as opposed to the 360's ATI GFX Card and the PowerPC processor. (I'm biased on this...I'll always choose a Nvidia Card over a ATI card)
When you speak of the other aspects they're pretty much on par. Only difference is the 360's memory capacity. Which isn't the most important thing on a console.
All in all my loyalty lies with Nintendo, but I believe Sony offers much more then Microsoft.
Quote:
Originally posted by ZeekUnreloaded@Sep 12 2005, 03:46 PM
Knights of the Old Republic was also a PC release (I won't lie it was a good game.)* Don't forget Fable was considered a big disappointment.* It didn't deliver all that was promised.* I never played Jade Empire so i'm not one to judge.
As to the Final Fantasy comment, thats only speculation.* As of right now no FF titles are set for any Xbox release.* Square Enix stated that its a possibility for a future release on another console but it also stated as long as Sony remains on top it will not change it's stance.* Square says it wants to keep it's FF series on the most dominate console.* Although i'm sure Square will release some of their other titles now on Xbox.
When I talked about Xbox games I mentioned Halo because it's one of the only good games thats exclusive to the system, most others: Splinter Cell, etc are multiplatform releases.
When I was referring to power I was talking about the cell processor (Which is amazing) and the RSX as opposed to the 360's ATI GFX Card and the PowerPC processor. (I'm biased on this...I'll always choose a Nvidia Card over a ATI card)
When you speak of the other aspects they're pretty much on par. Only difference is the 360's memory capacity.* Which isn't the most important thing on a console.
All in all my loyalty lies with Nintendo, but I believe Sony offers much more then Microsoft.
[snapback]78155[/snapback]
kotor the game of the year was on xbox, not pc. both are good, but it's better on the xbox. fable is still a great game, i play it all the time. ff is confirmed on the 360, again if you would like the proof i'd be happy to show you
here's the comparisons of the 360 vs ps2 since you obvoiusly don't get it..
http://portail.csdhr.qc.ca/EduGroupePub/pe...x360_vs_ps3.htm
i would say that calling ps2 the dominant console anymore is a very ignorant and false statement. the xbox sales have dominated the ps2 sales as of the last year. thank you. so square enix, while i doubt they even said that, must have said that before people woke up and bought an xbox, or they are just stupid.
splinter cells on other consoles don't even compare. don't get me started on that..
i've played chaos theory on the ps2 and xbox, and omfg, what a difference. by saying halo is the only good game only on xbox is pretty ignorant as well. now if you would like me to restate my list again, then i'll do so.most of the games on xbox are better than the versions for other consoles. they have better graphics and play better. it's pretty hard to deny that.
another example: brothers in arms. great on xbox, piss poor on ps2. great game, omfg amazing game.
I'm trying to take a non-aggresive approach in a mature manner but it seems as if you're taking it personally. Just calm down.
As for your site, it does bring up some good points that I didn't know, but the full specs on the RSX hasn't been released by Sony yet on paper. The only information told about the RSX is its expected results. (Like I said, i'm biased, i'll always choose Nvidia over ATI so I shouldn't even debate here)
Also your sources seem to lose credibility when the owner is a Xbox fanboy. I'm surprised he managed to surface that much. Nearly all of the specs that are being released are based on speculation (PS3 mostly). It hurts my head more then anything.
All we can really do it just wait for the release of both systems and see how they pan out. Cause in all honesty, nobody knows which is more powerful.
I'd like to see some information on Final Fantasy on XBox. I could have sworn at their conference they spoke that its possible for a future release, but as of right now their are no plans.
Although Xbox sales may have topped PS2 sales this year. The total number of units sold is clearly belonging to Sony.
If you want to get personal and throw comments like "You're ignorant" and etc. i'll gladly back down from this debate. I'm not here to fight. I'm trying to be reasonable about this.
Like I said in my first post, you're not going to change your stance and opinion and i'm not going to change mine. This debate is useless, and its taking up too much of my time to even fathom how to convince you. So I won't, because I don't care that much.
I just want a revolution.
dont tell me to calm down, i'm not getting agressive in the least bit. this is a debate, not a fight, so don't make me out to be the "bad guy". i don't like false information being passed. we'll just wait and see what happens i agreeQuote:
Originally posted by ZeekUnreloaded@Sep 12 2005, 06:33 PM
I'm trying to take a non-aggresive approach in a mature manner but it seems as if you're taking it personally.* Just calm down.
As for your site, it does bring up some good points that I didn't know, but the full specs on the RSX hasn't been released by Sony yet on paper.* The only information told about the RSX is its expected results. (Like I said, i'm biased, i'll always choose Nvidia over ATI so I shouldn't even debate here)
Also your sources seem to lose credibility when the owner is a Xbox fanboy.* I'm surprised he managed to surface that much.* Nearly all of the specs that are being released are based on speculation (PS3 mostly).* It hurts my head more then anything.
All we can really do it just wait for the release of both systems and see how they pan out.* Cause in all honesty, nobody knows which is more powerful.
I'd like to see some information on Final Fantasy on XBox.* I could have sworn at their conference they spoke that its possible for a future release, but as of right now their are no plans.
Although Xbox sales may have topped PS2 sales this year.* The* total number of units sold is clearly belonging to Sony.
If you want to get personal and throw comments like "You're ignorant" and etc. i'll gladly back down from this debate.* I'm not here to fight.* I'm trying to be reasonable about this.
Like I said in my first post, you're not going to change your stance and opinion and i'm not going to change mine.* This debate is useless, and its taking up too much of my time to even fathom how to convince you.* So I won't, because I don't care that much.
I just want a revolution.
[snapback]78195[/snapback]
XD I'm just trying to keep it a good debate and not a personal conflict. Otherwise people will think we're idiots. :-P
I as well don't like false information being passed.
I Think im getting all three of them but first i want to get the xbox360 , Cause im a Xbox Addict ;)
Grtz Restles
xbox 360 all the way! it looks cool, adn with the stats that microsoft claims it has, it has amazing power! i dont like the ps3 controller anywayz...looks like a boomerang. lol, can u imagine getting mad one day, throwing the ps3 remote, turning your back, and getting hit in the back of the head cuz it came baq. lol!
Nintendo Conference tonight! Hopefully controller specs released.
