thats fantastic.i lite it but i think that it is difficult1anyway nice job man...i would try it but i don't think that i will do it well
Printable View
thats fantastic.i lite it but i think that it is difficult1anyway nice job man...i would try it but i don't think that i will do it well
Too amazing i think i will use it and mix it to do a great sig when i will be able.
I'm going to attempt to make a sig with it, but then again who knows my computer might decide to jump on me again :/
Nice tut m8, thanks i'll like to try it out and see if mine comes as urs.. really interesting
Looks good! :ph34r:
Your sig is ripped from a tutorial example on a forum I visit, you've ripped it from the owner, and using it without saying where it came from. That makes you a Ripper.Quote:
Originally posted by rek@Mar 8 2005, 05:11 AM
I'm going to attempt to make a sig with it, but then again who knows my computer might decide to jump on me again :/
[snapback]15447[/snapback]
Think about what you just said. Take a look at every sig you see. Many come from tutorials. Are they covered with statements which state which tutorial they used? Some people use forty tutorials in a sig. Need they have a really really long statement on the bottom?
very impressive
I have only ripped the first thing you do, Gradient with Difference, do i have to write here from where i stole one gradient thingy that wasn't even the real tutorial?
In MY opinion, you suck. Anyway, nice tut... i didnt even know there was that kind of a effect,,, Why is it called a COMIC BOOK explosion :PQuote:
Originally posted by 7h0r@Feb 28 2005, 03:41 PM
One thing about stuff like this is that they have been overused and overrated. In my opinion, they all suck...
[snapback]11630[/snapback]
