myst who is this mystikal fool?
aa is a game for people who have ghetto computers or just have low expectations for games. no offense to anyone who plays it, i used to.. but i just hate it now. bf2 son.
Printable View
myst who is this mystikal fool?
aa is a game for people who have ghetto computers or just have low expectations for games. no offense to anyone who plays it, i used to.. but i just hate it now. bf2 son.
^^BF2>AA
also, in my opinion xbox=halo box, and you can get that for PC, so really xbox=n00b. PCs are superior, id rather have something that can play games and do other things than just something that plays games.
AA > BF2 .
You can play AA with anything, top of the range, or 256 ram. (Me using the latter). People play one game of AA, die, then never come back. It's completely different to CS (Blegh.), no rambos. BF2 is good, but spawn campers n' all that kill it.
Quote:
Originally posted by kompakt@Nov 25 2005, 02:18 PM
^^BF2>AA
also, in my opinion xbox=halo box, and you can get that for PC, so really xbox=n00b. PCs are superior, id rather have something that can play games and do other things than just something that plays games.
[snapback]96917[/snapback]
the xbox part is pretty dumb
first i'll say i hated halo 2, but halo was a great game
anyways xbox halo > pc halo
a lot of other xbox games > halo
therefore xbox =/= halo box
therefore xbox is not > or < than pc. it is =
lol.
PC > Xbox + PS2 > Gamecube
Anyways, AA is realistic and requires great strategy. Its like, a non-noob game. :)
CS I see people go like 75/5 and its like nothing, and in AA if you go like 20/5 a game your a pro :)
Quote:
Originally posted by Equal@Nov 25 2005, 05:49 PM
PC > Xbox + PS2 > Gamecube
Anyways, AA is realistic and requires great strategy. Its like, a non-noob game. :)
CS I see people go like 75/5 and its like nothing, and in AA if you go like 20/5 a game your a pro :)
[snapback]96966[/snapback]
i'm in agreement about aa taking skill and strategy, but as does bf2, but bf2 has 10x better graphics, and a more intense and complete combat feeling
joint operations was a fun game as well.. VERY tactical, and not crap graphics.
i think aa just needs to get itself a good graphics and physics engine, make their gameplay not so tedious, keep the realism, which will only be improved with a new physics system. THEN it will be a game i'd play. but right now it feels like rubbing sticks when i could use a zippo
^^once again, agreed, BF2 has amazing graphics, strategy and realism. i mean comon, you get shell shock in that game for crying out loud. combat feeling is totally there, even with my 2.1 speakers and integrated audio, it sounds like theres a plane flying over my head when one does, youre just totally immersed. strategy is there as well, also not to mention chaotic situations.
Quote:
Originally posted by kompakt@Nov 25 2005, 11:03 PM
^^once again, agreed, BF2 has amazing graphics, strategy and realism. i mean comon, you get shell shock in that game for crying out loud. combat feeling is totally there, even with my 2.1 speakers and integrated audio, it sounds like theres a plane flying over my head when one does, youre just totally immersed. strategy is there as well, also not to mention chaotic situations.
[snapback]97014[/snapback]
i have a subwoofer for my desktop lol
You get shell shock in AA :).Quote:
Originally posted by kompakt@Nov 26 2005, 04:03 PM
^^once again, agreed, BF2 has amazing graphics, strategy and realism. i mean comon, you get shell shock in that game for crying out loud. combat feeling is totally there, even with my 2.1 speakers and integrated audio, it sounds like theres a plane flying over my head when one does, youre just totally immersed. strategy is there as well, also not to mention chaotic situations.
[snapback]97014[/snapback]
yea, i have a sub too sui, i just meant that i can still hear things over my head with a 2.1 setup, imagine what itd be like if i had a surround sound with an actual sound card.
