also a bit 'empty minded'.... literallyQuote:
Originally posted by powerdw@Mar 29 2006, 06:09 PM
i do all 3, but i'm happy.
[snapback]117867[/snapback]
Printable View
also a bit 'empty minded'.... literallyQuote:
Originally posted by powerdw@Mar 29 2006, 06:09 PM
i do all 3, but i'm happy.
[snapback]117867[/snapback]
i smoke it every once and a while, it chills you out, makes you more relaxed, alcohol can make some people aggressive and violent, weed affects your memory though, and causes more damage than alcohol does
edit: id like to add that i drink to and ive done way more stupid shit while drunk than high
Come to Glasgow, please.Quote:
Originally posted by Usokki@Mar 29 2006, 11:19 PM
I agree with Tom. I beat the living shit out of druggies because they're so 'chilled out' and start touching me and shit. They wake up late for class with a big headache. Don't do drugs.
[snapback]117851[/snapback]
^ROFL^
I would say smoking hash is about the same as smoking just with a better kink lol.
I have never smoked anything, but i have some friends that do and it doesnt bother me. Should it be legal? well theres actually some good reasons for and against it. Like it or not legalizing it could stimulate the economy. all the government could do would be put a rediculous tax on pot, and it would defiantly grow to be as big as the tobacco companies are. While it is my opinion that the tobacco companies are manipulative and in a way evil, they are a big part of our economy. The cannibus market could be as well. Legalization could be easily denied too on the grounds that it is a mind altering substance. There could be unforseen problems with legalizing it, and there probably most certainly would be. For the time being my stance would be not to legalize it, but this is one of those issues that has strong points on both sides.
Yeah, anything regarding Psychoactive Drugs is always gunna be at most a balanced argument, I doubt there is a single psychoactive drug that has no mal effetcs.
Makes you think though, If alcohol had been discovered yesterday, and not thousands of years ago, would it be legal? I doubt it seriously.
Same goes for drugs really, if they had been discovered by governments, would they be banned? or would they be for sale to those over a certain age limit, afterall, the main problem (to the government) with drugs is that the finances involved are not taxed, meaning individuals can make a tidy sum of money where in a job it would take much longer.
Sorry to myself for edging offtopic there lol.
marijuana and opium have been around for thousands of years.....
i dont smoke it,
if you smoke it you are a loser, with no life, and you will fail in everything you attempt to do, you opinions become void, and you will die a long slow death, with no freinds, becasue no1 likes a weed smoker.
Quote:
Originally posted by Seki@Mar 30 2006, 04:16 AM
Come to Glasgow, please.
[snapback]117915[/snapback]
You're throwing the first punch, so that if you die I wont get punished as much. Believe me though, you don't want to mess with me.
Seki you gangster.
