I gotta disagree with you mate, and I am not saying I am an artist, but just because I'm new to the game doesnt mean that anything I make isnt concidered art. What youre saying sounds to me like you think that if I were a more experienced "artist" this piece would have been better, but because I am not experienced, it isnt good? Don't get me wrong, I appreciate your criticism, and I try my best to use that critisism, but just because I havnt added depth to the background (which was intentional) doesnt mean that its a bad piece...
Thanks,
Korrupt
11-20-2006, 12:13 AM
Spluff
Lol, tbh, I wouldn't classify ANY sig as art.
But if your going to classify some sigs as art, you have to classify the rest. Otherwise, where do you draw the line? Art by definition is "the product/s of human creativity" - Just because somebody is less talented, does it mean that their work is less a product of creativity?
11-20-2006, 05:19 AM
ev1
You got me wrong korrupt I wasn't trying to say that just because you aren't experienced it doesn't matter what you do it still isn't art. The problem is as Spluff stated it, you cant draw a line and specify where art stops.
And of course, just because a piece doesn't have depth doesn't mean it's bad, but it's bad for you if your piece doesnt have depth because you don't know how to add depth, and the point of my critique is to help you improve, not your piece.
In other words, my point is, even if your piece was 100% appealing I still wouldn't believe you are a good sig maker if you told me you don't know any of the ways that exist to add depth to a graphics piece. It would be like you're telling me you can shoot a 3 pointer all the way from outside the court therefore you're a perfect shooter yet you miss all 2 pointers.
11-20-2006, 05:28 AM
korrupt
Yer, thanks mate, I actually knew how to add depth, I just didnt know thats what it was called lol:) Thanks for your help though man:)
