The sig is boring. But for a text sig, I think it rather good. Like the "worn out" font you're using or w/e effect you used. Really goes with with word.
9/10
Printable View
The sig is boring. But for a text sig, I think it rather good. Like the "worn out" font you're using or w/e effect you used. Really goes with with word.
9/10
Your favourites been rated god knows how many times..
Your latest: 6/10; Not really keen on it, the random pink ovals at the bottom are weird, the text is pretty bad and I just don't really like this piece compared to your others.
Lol. I don't really hang out in this thread xD
Edging on mono, the splatter are decently placed, though I would some parts more to be honest. The depth and flow is good as well. The depth not as good, but it gives you a "sense" you know. Probably not, I'm really weird xD
9/10
the 1st one is awesome alot of effects and depth. xD
10/10
the 2nd looks cool but its too bright for me lol if it had a few photo filters to make it a lil bit darker i culd see all the effects better.
8/10
xD
3.5/10 colours are off, lightning is off and its a low Q
Very nice stuff but very messy, I hate messy D; .
7/10 for desert eagle and 8/10 for the soccer one (damn, I've seen the guy but forgot his name)
6/10 too small
7/10 too small and lil work done
5/10
silent, you really need a new tag. That's been there like since I joined. :|
Anyway, I'll give it 8/10. I like the effects and text works well but don't like the rounded corners and would like to see something else added. I'm not sure what. :|
My fave sig from you yet. The effects, c4ds you used and how you use them really brought the Rulk's power IMO. The text, hmmm, passes. The splatter, lose it. The depth is non-existent though. I'll give it 9/10. Not alot, but not alot wrong either.
