Rate the signature above you.

Very flat, can see smudging, low quality, lighting is off, bad text and text placement and dislike the back shadow thing so about 3/10

The first one's a 8.5/10 epic lighting but that's all it is so no matter how good I think it looks I can't really rate it higher as a signature:)
The second one is a 9/10 as the lighting is once again insane and the depth is amazing.

ferry nice ;)

just looks like a brush with text 2/10

love the effects...flow looks good...wish there was a light source on the left side of the tag...7.5/10

6/10 Flow not present and the render looks LQ. Also the text and the person on the lower left distract from the focal... Sorry, not my favourite:(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by zole

Very flat, can see smudging, low quality, lighting is off, bad text and text placement and dislike the back shadow thing so about 3/10

---

seeing the smudging was part of the sig,
didn't come out to well, it was one of my first.
3/10
doesn't appeal to me, looks like a pic with a Filtered background.

Remove the text, too bright on the right side with no indication of lighting on the render, fairly good smudging.
6/10

8/10
little sharp
lol :p

5/10 I have a thing for dogs, not cats :D