The same with me. I have first hand experience with long term users of the drug, and those were actual observations. Thusly, its logical.
Printable View
The same with me. I have first hand experience with long term users of the drug, and those were actual observations. Thusly, its logical.
i guess it depends on what you define as logic. What's logical to one person, may not be logical to another.
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Xtremerunnerars @ Apr 29 2006, 03:28 PM) [snapback]167116[/snapback]</div>I suppose we all need a degree in International Relations so we could debate about current events as well? :P Every thesis, every position paper has citations from a secondary source because the writer always needs qualified support, regardless of apparent bias. For the best qualified supporting information, look up scholarly journals in JSTOR or something.Quote:
Kaliedoscope, how do you know those sites you come up with aren't pro cannabis? Why don't you actually learn HOW to analyze chemicals, HOW to monitor brain activity, and THEN try and make your points. Otherwise, you're not better than any of us, contrary to what your tone is. All you're doing is finding information on the internet. And all we're doing? Finding information on the internet.
Join a medical team, do tests. Until then, i'm not believing anything anyone posts.
[/b]
I can see where you are coming from though, best way to know the effects of cannabis is to try it out yourself :) I only support cannabis because all the supposed effects did not happen when I used it regularly. I'm still a clear-thinker and still motivated and don't do other drugs, hell I don't even drink much.
All the arguments made so far are logical, but some push the lines.
Vermillion, you don't like cannabis because your friends used to be fun and now they are not because they started smoking it. Makes sense, everyone wants their friends to be fun. :D But if your friends were weak enough to let a plant run their lives, then that doesn't say much about their personality in general.
My argument was just using logic, obviously spirits do not exist. And the only close minded person around here is you. You just cant admit thar drugs are harmful.
Agreed
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(SgtSwabs @ May 4 2006, 04:34 PM) [snapback]167490[/snapback]</div>Definatly your own opinion, and at that your being closed minded by saying OBVIOUSLY they dont exist.Quote:
My argument was just using logic, obviously spirits do not exist. And the only close minded person around here is you. You just cant admit thar drugs are harmful.
[/b]
How can People critisize drugs like weed, if they havent ever done it?
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Henry @ May 6 2006, 06:32 PM) [snapback]167705[/snapback]</div>.Quote:
Definatly your own opinion, and at that your being closed minded by saying OBVIOUSLY they dont exist.
How can People critisize drugs like weed, if they havent ever done it?
[/b]
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Henry @ May 7 2006, 12:32 AM) [snapback]167705[/snapback]</div>Thats like saying "How can you critisize smoking when you havn't done it" when obviously you can critisize smoking because it's harmful to the body, it's the same case with most drugsQuote:
How can People critisize drugs like weed, if they havent ever done it?
[/b]
No Swabs, i see what you're saying but... smoking is different , smoking is addictive. And you could criticise the chemicals, but if you criticised the people that would be harsh, it's not their fault ( generally ) that they're addicted.
Weed can be addictive if you have it often?
And thats been told to me by my friends so dont say its some bullshit from the internet.
