HAHAH i only agree with payback and oil part:)
Printable View
HAHAH i only agree with payback and oil part:)
Please, read my post if you intend on replying to it. It makes no sense for you to criticize my post without having actually thoroughly read it.
If you'd like my sources for both the oil and the information on the WTC here:
http://www.tms.org/pubs/journals/JOM/0112/...Eagar-0112.html - WTC
http://www.eia.doe.gov/pub/oil_gas/petrole...ent/import.html - Oil (do the math like I did)
So, you're saying that the CIA went to Afghanistan, trained the extremist soldiers in how to hijack a plane in the United States and crash it into one of the most important buildings to the world economy? Did I understand that right? If I did, no offense, but you're a lunatic.
You can teach me how to build a bomb true enough. I can use that information to go blow up my neighbor's house. However, if you provided me with the money, the materials, and the training knowing my intentions of blowing up my neighbor's house, that wouldn't be considered freedom of speech. That would make you an accomplice in a serious felony.
Of course they only found was a warehouse of chemicals. Hussein didn't allow the UN inspectors in at first, delaying them, and then he made them leave before they even finished their search. They were delayed long enough for the weapons to be moved.
I'll look for my original source (its been awhile), but in the mean time, heres another one showing the opinion of the Isreali general and multiple important Iraqis (i.e. the head of a political party pushing the Iraqi government to continue chemical weapon research).
http://www.nysun.com/article/24480
The UN is now, in fact, asking Syria to allow inspectors to search. Syria, just like Iraq, isn't complying and isn't letting them. If they don't have the weapons, why can't the inspectors look? Syria is one of only 8 countries that didn't sign the Chemical Weapons Convention.
Edit: Silly me, I forgot to address your "bush is now in control" comment. Obviously Bush is not in control. There is a democracy there, there have been elections with the majority of the people voting. Besides, this part I havent researched this topic extensively, but even if Bush was "in controle" I don't think he'd have control over the oil. Iraq is part of OPEC, an organization unifying oil export from the 11 top oil producing countries. Meaning, OPEC controls all outbound oil and oil prices to ensure that the prices are stable and that neither party (producers nor consumers) can benefit over the other. It is meant to keep things steady and equal, so the idea that now that Bush has set up democracy in Iraq and that now gives him complete control over Iraqi oil exports is wrong.
No you didnt understand it right. While i posting I read your post thoroughly.
Sorry but the WTC Link seems reallllly strange. To be exact The WTC towers lasted for one to two hours It was 74 minutes for Tower 1. And less then an hour for tower 2.
Why would syria let america in, So the same can happen to them just like the whole middle east went through with it.
This whole issue is shady, and we'll never know. But im just reporting what i imagine it is. Im taking into account all these facts becuase im unbiased and open minded but i still belive Dylan has substantial evidance for his claim. Im done argueing, i just wanted to post my opinion.
Read my updated post.
Please, don't call yourself unbiased because thats just as much of a lie as the rest of this conspiracy theory.
Syria would, logically, let the UN in (note: not america. again, thats united nations, not united states), so that nobody has any lingering suspicions. We will know whether there are weapons or not. Asserting that if they let inspectors in means that America is going to invade Syria is rediculous.
The reason the link may seem strange is because it says different than "loose change" which has been your basis for your entire arguement. Check the sources at the bottom of the page. Theyre all credible: MIT, National Fire Protection Association etc. Sorry, but I think your whole arguement thus far has been completely groundless. I like discussion though, this is fun stuff.
I am unbiased. Im not disagreeing that your putting up a valid and good arguement. But this woulid better be handled off of this forum.
How about other sources that were provided in loose chnage + more. Example: Steven Jones take on WTC.
http://www.physics.byu.edu/research/energy/htm7.html
Just to let you know, the US Consumes 25% of the Worlds Oil, and Iraq isn't and never even was in the top 5 suppliers of the US's oil. So that's not why we wen't to Iraq.
Wondering why gas prices are so high right now? It's because we are creating a new mixture which includes 90% gasoline and 10% ethanol. Also, GM cars will be compatible with E-85, which is a mixture that includes 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline.
http://www.gm.com/company/onlygm/
Oh, and the comment about clowns taking over a bus with squirt guns...
Yea, well one guy robbed a bank using an airsoft pistol... don't think it isn't possible.
Oh and the terrorists didn't use only box cutters... they were able to get some plastic handled knives in too...
Quote:
Just to let you know, the US Consumes 25% of the Worlds Oil, and Iraq isn't and never even was in the top 5 suppliers of the US's oil. So that's not why we wen't to Iraq.
Wondering why gas prices are so high right now? It's because we are creating a new mixture which includes 90% gasoline and 10% ethanol. Also, GM cars will be compatible with E-85, which is a mixture that includes 85% ethanol and 15% gasoline.
http://www.gm.com/company/onlygm/
Oh, and the comment about clowns taking over a bus with squirt guns...
Yea, well one guy robbed a bank using an airsoft pistol... don't think it isn't possible.
Oh and the terrorists didn't use only box cutters... they were able to get some plastic handled knives in too...
[/b]
the reason the terrorists took over the plane so easily was because people NEVER suspected them to crash the plane. in the typical hijacking, the terrorists just take over the plane, get to where they're going, and let the people go. if a terrorist comes in threatening to have a bomb, armed with a box cutter (yes a box cutter, but when someone acts erradicly threatening to kill everyone, you tend to get somewhat uneasy) so the passengers figured they'd wait it out.
hence why, on flight 93, when the passengers heard the terrorists were using the planes to crash into buildings, they decided to do something about it, because this was no ordinary hijacking where cooperation with the terrorists lets you live.
IMHO, I think Flight 93 will probably be the most remembered flight.
The way they teamed up together to try to reattain control of the plane, and how they almost got one of the passengers into the pilots seat that was a certified pilot.
I'm gonna try to see the movie "United 93" when it comes out, but it will be a pretty difficult movie to watch, and it will be heartbreaking. Although, I have no idea how the husbands/wives/children of some of the victims in that plane are gonna take it...
They will probably see them as heroes though... which, without a doubt, they are.
LOL that Flight 93 Stuff was bullshit, and this new United 93 movie will be too. haha im only gonna watcht that movie cauase i work at century theaters. "lets Roll 911 "
Tell the families of flight 93 that...Quote:
LOL that Flight 93 Stuff was bullshit, and this new United 93 movie will be too. haha im only gonna watcht that movie cauase i work at century theaters. "lets Roll 911 "
[/b]
