Printable View
I hate how everyone is saying how the PS3 is so much better power wise than the xbox 360. WELL OF COURSE IT IS, its coming out a year later and everyone knows how fast technology is advancing so it SHOULD be much better power wise than the xbox 360 by far.
Just for ****'s sake, ima post this list I had in my magazine.
Quote:
Power:
1. PS3
2. Xbox 360
3. Rev
Games:
1. Rev
2. PS3
3. Xbox360
Online:
1. Xbox 360
2. PS3
3. Rev[/b]
SO im thinking based on that myst, it says PS3 has the better overall. 1st place (2ce) from PS3, then a 2nd place... woot. yeahhh boi. lol
Oh, and Brothers in Arms (PS3) > BiA (360)
lol
and to be honest, yes, some of the shooters play better on the 360, but i just think thats the only good games they have. And a few RPGs, but compared to the Sony list of RPGs, the 360 loses. There are so many types of RPGs, so if someone likes one type, the 360 may not have it. The PS2 had like 20 different types of RPGs for all fans :)
<3
Technically based on that list it would be the best overall, correct. There was an article to go along with the list and it said basically that PS3 is for power, Xbox 360 for online and Rev for games. I am definately getting a Rev. Its going to have a lower price than the other 2 and GREAT games. Can you say ZELDA ON REV? lol. Nintendo always has the lower power specs than the others but it always uses all of its power and has the greatest games.
i think the 360 and the ps3 will both be great systems, and if i could afford it i would get both, but cant so i had to make a choice, so i chose the 360 and although i dont have one yet, i will get one as soon as i can.
i dont really care about graphics, tbh i think the best games were made on the older consoles when the grahics really werent good, but the gameplay was amazing.
then i looked at games, and the 360's lineup appealed to me more. it has some great shooters, and that racers and some fighting games is all i play. and although ps3 has those types of games too, i love the ones coming for 360 and i like the 360 controller more than the ps3's and think it works much better for shooters and racing games.
then i thought about and i just know xbox live will always dominate over ps3's. ps3's may be free, but i think the cost for xbox live is well worth it.
i'm sorry? thats fucking stupid.Quote:
SO im thinking based on that myst, it says PS3 has the better overall. 1st place (2ce) from PS3, then a 2nd place... woot. yeahhh boi. lol
Oh, and Brothers in Arms (PS3) > BiA (360)
[/b]
this is completely opinion, so don't state it as fact. personally, i like the 360's rpg's 10 times more than the series the ps3 has to offer.. but you see that is an opinion, not me saying.. the ps3 losesQuote:
and to be honest, yes, some of the shooters play better on the 360, but i just think thats the only good games they have. And a few RPGs, but compared to the Sony list of RPGs, the 360 loses. There are so many types of RPGs, so if someone likes one type, the 360 may not have it. The PS2 had like 20 different types of RPGs for all fans :)
<3[/b]
so way to be a fanboy, no mas.
i simply said the rpgs appeal more to a wide range of people since they have many more.
that isnt true, since the PS3's is based specifically off the XBox 360's.. so more than likely it will be like 95% the same. And if they are, then the PS3's will be way more appealing because its free for all.Quote:
then i thought about and i just know xbox live will always dominate over ps3's. ps3's may be free, but i think the cost for xbox live is well worth it.[/b]
yes, but also, 360 games are great on xbl, even the first ones that come out will still be played years from now.. they've already gotten a strong hold in that regard. also, the marketplace is a fantastic part of xbl that i dont think psonline will have, so that is a huge advantage it would hold over itQuote:
i simply said the rpgs appeal more to a wide range of people since they have many more.
that isnt true, since the PS3's is based specifically off the XBox 360's.. so more than likely it will be like 95% the same. And if they are, then the PS3's will be way more appealing because its free for all.
[/b]
the marketplace is another place for microsoft to get money... them whores
Calling Microsoft whores? Sony is charging like $500 for the base system for the PS3. Tell me that's not whorish. And I love how you say that PS3's online will be 95% the same as xbox live. Too bad it will not be. Xbox live is ever changing and Sony will not be able to keep up with Xbox's knowledge of online gaming. Sony did very have online, but it was primitive and I doubt their online will be as good as xbox live.Quote:
the marketplace is another place for microsoft to get money... them whores
[/b]
And yes, Sui is right. 360 already has a base of online gamers playing the games that they whore it up and they will be playing for the next year even when PS3 comes out.
Yes, this whole debate is subjective so far until the PS3 does come out and they are compared.
Quote:
the marketplace is another place for microsoft to get money... them whores
[/b]
um a LOT of the content on marketplace is FREE.. the only stuff that costs money SHOULD cost money (games, significant add-ons, themes).. some themes are free, but depending on the game, they aren't, and that's the game developer's choice, not microsoft's.
and yes sony's price is outrageous, i agree with myst. it's minutely more powerful than the 360, if hardly at all, and they think they can just charge that much more? The only reason they are is because they know they can, they have a strong fanbase in Japan and the US and they know people will give into their prices. Some games really excite me about the PS3, but either i'll get the 360 version which is just as good, or just forget about the game altogether. I don't need to spend another 600 dollars for a few new games
