No way it was stagged.
@ Anarchy stfu.
Printable View
No way it was stagged.
@ Anarchy stfu.
Well where's the plane, honostly. two 12 ton titanium alloy engines dont just vaporize. The whole that the plane left is only like 20 feetx10x6
Im not even gonna reply to you Mr.Black
That was the plan. You weren't supposed to talk.Quote:
Well where's the plane, honostly. two 12 ton titanium alloy engines dont just vaporize. The whole that the plane left is only like 20 feetx10x6
Im not even gonna reply to you Mr.Black
[/b]
Anarchy, you seem to know a lot about 911, maybe you should join the government. Heck, it sounds like you know more about 911 than the government, the families that lost relatives in the crash, and even the terrorists themselves!
[/sarcasm]
Could you link me to the source where you got the info. that the hole was 20x10x6 feet? I know the guy in my video said it was something like that, but he said it appeared to be that wide, but your mind does play tricks on you.
Ok well here is a simple science class for you.. Watch almost any video of an F1 racing crash on a straight away when the car is at top speed, those vehicles are going maybe what 200 mph?
Example
now, if a plane is going 500 + mph, what do you think will happen to it? besides, if the plane or engines did not disintegrate on impact, then they sure would have been finished off after the entire building collapsed..
now, about the size of the hole, all you need to do to find out about that is measure or look at the specs of a 767 plane.. simple as that, it wouldnt make a hole 20 ft, it would be a bit more imo and also i dont really thin a 20X10X6 hole in a building would make it completely collapse on itself.. that hole would be about what, 2 office rooms?
actually from accounts of families of the hijackers and those involved that were not on the planes, the terrorists were religiously driven and were convinced that it was God's will to take all those lives to heaven..Quote:
the reason the terrorists took over the plane so easily was because people NEVER suspected them to crash the plane. in the typical hijacking, the terrorists just take over the plane, get to where they're going, and let the people go. if a terrorist comes in threatening to have a bomb, armed with a box cutter (yes a box cutter, but when someone acts erradicly threatening to kill everyone, you tend to get somewhat uneasy) so the passengers figured they'd wait it out.[/b]
sadly, one of my longest posts ever, anywhere. :o
Which flight are we talking about here? It was flight 77 that hit the pentagon, flight 93 crashed over Pennsylvania when the passengers took back the plane.
Quote:
<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE
Quote:
the reason the terrorists took over the plane so easily was because people NEVER suspected them to crash the plane. in the typical hijacking, the terrorists just take over the plane, get to where they're going, and let the people go. if a terrorist comes in threatening to have a bomb, armed with a box cutter (yes a box cutter, but when someone acts erradicly threatening to kill everyone, you tend to get somewhat uneasy) so the passengers figured they'd wait it out.[/b]
actually from accounts of families of the hijackers and those involved that were not on the planes, the terrorists were religiously driven and were convinced that it was God's will to take all those lives to heaven.. [/b][/quote]
Um I'm confused. Which part of Sui's post are you arguing with? It sounds like you were disagreeing with something in it anyway. He never said anything about what the terrorists' actual motivation was, only what people expected their plans to be.
nevermind.. i was thinking too hard.. i misunderstood his post.. i missed the "so easily" in his post and read it as " the reason the terrorists took over the plane was..." my bad.. :(
Its cool ;) happens to the best of us.
I ment you had a bullshit post black.
There are photo's Ground + Aerial. Just look at the photo's and do the math.Quote:
Could you link me to the source where you got the info. that the hole was 20x10x6 feet? I know the guy in my video said it was something like that, but he said it appeared to be that wide, but your mind does play tricks on you.[/b]
First off, the F1 Weighs at most 1 Ton. The commercial jet weighs 100 tons. Now examine the video. The construction of the F1 is Carbon Fiber which breaks on that kind of impact. The engine however(according to your video) Stayed intact. Where's the engine from pentagon OR shanksville.Quote:
Ok well here is a simple science class for you.. Watch almost any video of an F1 racing crash on a straight away when the car is at top speed, those vehicles are going maybe what 200 mph?
Example
now, if a plane is going 500 + mph, what do you think will happen to it? besides, if the plane or engines did not disintegrate on impact, then they sure would have been finished off after the entire building collapsed..
now, about the size of the hole, all you need to do to find out about that is measure or look at the specs of a 767 plane.. simple as that, it wouldnt make a hole 20 ft, it would be a bit more imo and also i dont really thin a 20X10X6 hole in a building would make it completely collapse on itself.. that hole would be about what, 2 office rooms? [/b]
If we were talkinga bout the pentagon and how the collapse of the buildings took the engines with them, the engines would have turned up in the rubble as they went through it. And according to how the plane Flew in, the engines woulda been lodged on the sides of the building 35 Feet apart(dont know the exact measurment from Engine to Engine on a 767(if it was a 767)
Why the hell would the Pentagon blow up 1/5 of their building!?! That makes no sense whatsoever!
Do you mind linking me to arial photos? I can't seem to find any arial shots on google or anything...Quote:
There are photo's Ground + Aerial. Just look at the photo's and do the math.[/b]
I did find this one kept appearing on google however http://www.september11news.com/Fligh...terReuters.jpg
to me, that looks a bigger than 20 feet...
Evidence of Flight 93 crash...
Eyewitnesses of the Flight 93 crash...Quote:
"Eight miles away in New Baltimore, Melanie Hankinson said she found singed papers and other light debris from the crash, including pages from Hemispheres Magazine, United's in-flight magazine. Stoe said authorities initially insisted crash debris could not have traveled over a mountain ridge more than eight miles from the crash.[/b]
Quote:
"Once it hit, everything just disintegrated," he said. "There are just shreds of metal. The longest piece I saw was 2 feet long."[/b]
Quote:
"There was no way anything was left," Pluta added. "There was just charred pieces of metal and a big hole. The plane didn't slide into the crash. It went straight into the ground. Wings out. Nose down."[/b]
Quote:
Bob Blair of Stoystown was driving a coal truck on state Route 30 when he saw the jet plummet "straight down." Barn windowpanes for half a mile around shattered as the jet dived into a reclaimed strip mine and exploded at 10:10 a. m.
[/b]
Quote:
"Then it just rolled over and was flying upside down for a few seconds ... and then it kind of stalled and did a nose dive over the trees. It was just unreal to see something like that."
[/b]
Quote:
A witness told WTAE-TV's Paul Van Osdol that she saw the plane overhead. It made a high-pitched, screeching sound. The plane then made a sharp, 90-degree downward turn and crashed.
[/b]
Quote:
“I saw the plane flying upside down overhead and crash into the nearby trees. My buddy, Doug, and I grabbed our fire extinguishers and ran to the scene,” said Blair.[/b]
What is better evidence of the plane crashing, than the eyewitnesses themselves?
