Quote:
appreciate the sarcasm and remarks gentleman, but bush pulled support for katrina familes, i find that fked up
[/b]
fema was late, it wasn't bush's fault.
Printable View
Quote:
appreciate the sarcasm and remarks gentleman, but bush pulled support for katrina familes, i find that fked up
[/b]
fema was late, it wasn't bush's fault.
if usa can trick us with the going to the moon, then they can trick us by planting bombs in the buildings ...
but we did go to the moon, and we didn't plant bombs in the buildings.
Simple as that.
Econmoic gain, They wanna wage war on iraq and middle east, so this just give them a justified reason.
I like new orleans, i dont think its all that sinful. Then why doesnt Las Vegas get destroyed if you guys dont call that sinfull. New orleans was place for entertainment.
2k is not enough to live on your own. An appartment is 1000 a month if not more.
It's enough for food until they get something called a job, then they will be able to afford an apartment.Quote:
2k is not enough to live on your own. An appartment is 1000 a month if not more.
[/b]
Most of them slept in an empty Wal-Mart building, Reunion Arena, and other shelters across Texas, until they could get an appartment.
I know very well 2k isn't enough for an apartment, but the government and Visa provided plenty of money to get them started. They had their previous Credit Card, and Debit Card accounts on top of that. They most likely had more money after Katrina, than the few minutes before Katrina (unless they took all their money in cash, which is very stupid).
I never said Las Vegas wasn't a city of sin, but New Orleans was one. I've been there too, it is obviously a city of sin. Even Mardi Gras takes place there, that's one of the most sinful holidays incase you didn't know.
It takes place right before Ash Wednesday so you can get all your sin out before the holy holiday. That was the point of Mardi Gras.
Now, back to 9/11 again.
Why would they just want to go to war with Iraq?Quote:
Econmoic gain, They wanna wage war on iraq and middle east, so this just give them a justified reason.[/b]
Your 'reasons' aren't making much sense dude... tell me why they would want to go to war with Iraq, don't tell me "Economic Gain" because you've already said that at least 4 times.
Tell me what we would gain economically.
BTW: you have a couple spelling errors.
- EconomicQuote:
Econmoic[/b]
- apartmentQuote:
appartment[/b]
Umm the war in Iraq is not improving our economy. Far from it. If it were a war where everyone supported it such as World War 2, the economy would get better. and katrina was the local government's fault, not bush.
Yeah I'm wondering about this economic gain myself. He keeps saying that but doesn't have any logical reasons to support it.
Bush doesn't have control over Iraq's oil now and he won't in the future because its part of OPEC which is controls prices and oil distribution. Plus, Iraq has contributed only 0.047% of America's crude oil in the past year and 0.040% of America's petroleum. That number has remained steady so clearly oil isn't the motivation.
As for other economic gains, of which I'd like to hear some examples other than oil, so far we've only been getting into debt due to the war. I'm not seeing the profits that we're making.
The economic gain is in oil but, not for the country. The gain is for all of Bushs family and long time friends in the oil business. Also Dick Chenneys old company Halliburton is making a ton of money over there. Yes it's good that we got Saddam out of power but, don't you notice how nobody even talks about finding Osama anymore.
I dont understand how bush would be getting this oil being that it is regulated by opec. I think that the reason we aren't talking about Osama is that we must focus on the task at hand, being that it needs our full attention ;) I believe that once we have finished in Iraq (I can see it still lasting for awhile) we will move on and try to find Osama.
OPEC is what regulates oil trade across the world, although they don't regulate all of it, they regulate most of it. It just depends on how it gets shipped out here, that's the main aspect where the differential in all oil prices is. Bush (like Jack said) wouldn't be getting any better deals than us when it comes to oil.
Plus, oil prices only go up $.01-.02 from when they receive them in the barrels. So, at the pump, you are basically paying the same price as the barrels, at most, only 3 cents more.
That's what I think is gonna happen too.Quote:
I think that the reason we aren't talking about Osama is that we must focus on the task at hand, being that it needs our full attention. I believe that once we have finished in Iraq (I can see it still lasting for awhile) we will move on and try to find Osama. [/b]
There are many people who belive osama is already dead. Most of our oil comes from alaska and canada
