[kra]No you cant link. I posted the image. Thanks Flash for posting it here.[/kra]
Not usre if i can direct link you guys, but hopefully i can , hope you guys like :)
http://img160.echo.cx/img160/9473/vectorrender2hz.gif
Printable View
[kra]No you cant link. I posted the image. Thanks Flash for posting it here.[/kra]
Not usre if i can direct link you guys, but hopefully i can , hope you guys like :)
http://img160.echo.cx/img160/9473/vectorrender2hz.gif
nice tut ive just started getting into vector art :)
Im going to try it out
:wacko:
thats not vector at all :mellow:
me thinks thats how krazy does his awesome tupac sigs
hmmm ive found that using the pen tool, and colouring over it with basic colours can look more effective :)
lol thats cheating :P if your gonna vector something from an image, use the image as reference, dont take the easy way out and go over it. anybody can do that ;) it loses its artistic aspect that way
nice tut man check out wat i got:
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v2...1/0c34753a.jpg
I don't really care for the tut. Pretty much the same reason why Jack doesn't. As someone that vectors I think its cheating a bit and takes all skill out of the PS "vector". If your going to trace a stock image at least go through the time and work and use the pen tool or lasso it. The out come is alot better and it won't get you laughed off any advanced GFX board.
Plus Kev..its okay but take out all the white tech lines and it would look alot better.
That has nothing to do with vectoring....
I donno if that was you who made it.. or someone else.
But here is a note for you. If you don't know what true vectoring is.. or if you don't know how to do it. Then don't try and make a tut on it.
This needs to be called.. Filterising renders :P