great bg, nice ,sharp render. but the text, you spent alot of time with the rest of the sig, i can tell, you should spend more time looking for a bettere text for that nice sig
08-22-2005, 10:38 PM
Mr Toasty
lmao, your off ur pixel stretch phase? anyway, i really like it, and it looks like theres something on the right (theres not right? o.O). only CnC is text (always the text with you freak :P) anyway, keep up the good-non-pixel-stretching-work! :lol:
08-23-2005, 12:05 AM
Freak
3 out of 43 views replied? Come on people...I need CnC. Thanks!!
08-23-2005, 12:16 AM
undertone
meh, doesn really float my boat sorry.
and i like it more unblended, seems like you went overboard on the blending.
maybe its the text, maybe its the bg, just dont like this style of signature.
08-23-2005, 12:54 AM
Elleray
if your going to fix it, fix what looks bad, not what looks good :)
08-23-2005, 02:30 AM
Hunter
The sig looks great, but the text is very plain. IMO the third one is the best out of them. The 2nd render doesn't look the best.
08-23-2005, 05:49 AM
RAHTING
Imo the 3rd one is the best, i think you need to find a new font to go with the rest of the sig but apart from that i like it a lot. GJ :)
08-23-2005, 06:50 AM
ANtidote
Its all about what you like. After all, arent you the one that will use it?
I dont think there is anything wrong i like the first one better and maybe add a bit of glow to the text but its awesome.
GJ again man.
08-23-2005, 09:39 AM
iceryu
cant see the face O_O
08-23-2005, 10:32 AM
Freak
I know, that's how the render is.
08-23-2005, 11:33 AM
AcidGlow
Sig looks pretty good how it is the first time. :)
08-23-2005, 01:18 PM
Infidel
the text on all of them isnt great. on ur edit, the text colour doesnt match the sig.
love the background and render though (i would keep the render unblended btw)