Printable View
ok, NO Hater votes and when you vote, please explain which aspects from both sigs you liked or disliked(helps)
I think he's battling with 2 sigs, but here they are maybe he can choose.
Sobek:
http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3...ysprite4rq.png
http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/9...present5qy.png
Anarchy:
http://img508.imageshack.us/img508/2684/16copy2rw.gif
Sobek gmv
his sigs have more color and depth, they also have better flow
sobek gmv.
better flow/lighting/colours
anarchy's sig could use better colours.. and the 3d string render just doesn't fit with the bg..
Anarchy GTV, I absolutly hate the style of sobeks sigs tbh =( sorry mate
sobek gmv
anarchy's render is just stale, undetailed, and unoriginal, the color and brushing are mediocre, and i don't care for the text.
Anarchy's. Sobek's just look unfinished.
sobek gmb just way better than your anarchy, im sorry
With out a doubt Sobek. Better use of color, better lighting, better just about everything.
Anarchy gmv, Sobeks just looks plain to me...not really much to look at imo.
On real battles, a sig withoiut a border is an automatic loss :/ lol but ok lets live without that
@whoever said i used render, no render bro.
Anarchy -3
Sobek - 5
Keep voting folk, first to 10
And since Sobek posted 2
Here is my 2nd entry
http://www.exoload.net/uploads/406/1145569700.gif
Whats GMV and stuff???
Your joking right? There are many sigs that would look stupid with borders. I mean yes they should be used when needed but not every sigs look good with them.
Also yes you did use a render. Whats the swirly thing at the bottom made from? It doesn't look like anything made with fitlers or brushes.
Even with the new tag Sobek gmv(Got my vote). The colors in the new one is dull and random. And I don't care for the typo to much either.
No, borders of at least 1px are required. Its a well known fact. If you dont know this, get away from voting. The Colors arnt random. And that is NOT a render. it is a brush. Borders should always be used.
What typo???
Typo stand for typography...
And nothing is required when making a tag or any other piece of art.
There are standards, just as there are for everything else. There are certain things that must be done. DEPENDING on the type of art. His SIgnatures NEED Borders.
using a brush is even worse. all your sigs are are someone else's brushes + color + text, which is why i don't think you'll ever gmv.Quote:
No, borders of at least 1px are required. Its a well known fact. If you dont know this, get away from voting. The Colors arnt random. And that is NOT a render. it is a brush. Borders should always be used.
What typo???
[/b]
but this isn't the place.
Signatures do not NEED borders so just drop that bullshit, and honestly, yours is just a bunch of downloaded brushes/renders that are slapped onto a sig canvas with a color balance. He actually took some thought on lighting and flow that actually matched up nicely with his stocks.Quote:
There are standards, just as there are for everything else. There are certain things that must be done. DEPENDING on the type of art. His SIgnatures NEED Borders.
[/b]
Sobek GMV.
Can't believe you said that.Quote:
No, borders of at least 1px are required. Its a well known fact.[/b]
But I guess that thought will go away after you design more and expose yourself to more art, rather than the stereotypical "1px black border, slap-on DLed grunge Brushes + Render" sig. :)
Ok First thing, THOSE ARENT STOCKS> Get the terminology right. There is NO lighting in those sigs. You drop the bullshit, half you here cant make a decent sig. I cant wait tilL CX drops sobek, i dont know how the **** he made staff. The rest of you, take a lesson. Sigs without borders dont contrast well with backgrounds. Especially if its white on white(DuHHH) I prefer 2 px(Black/White with white on opacity)
He spent no time on those sigs because HONOSTLY they look shitty as hell. Im trying to be nice and give him critism that can help him. He goes and bitches about shit creating excuses how he's accepted in to graphics forums. If you should know, the best designers are freelance.
Done arguing, just vote
Thats what thier there for dumbass, its the way you use them that matters. Thats like saying "Here's a pencil, instead you go and make your own(choppin wood and getting lead etc..)Quote:
using a brush is even worse. all your sigs are are someone else's brushes + color + text, which is why i don't think you'll ever gmv.[/b]
LOL! Where in the art of signature making, is it a rule that you must have a border? Where i ask? Nowhere. How on earth do you think you can give rules to art? You can't. It's about creativity. It's about being different. Making things unique and astounding. So do you still insist on trying to make me believe that it's a well known fact that 1px borders are an absolute must on a signature?Quote:
No, borders of at least 1px are required. Its a well known fact. If you dont know this, get away from voting. The Colors arnt random. And that is NOT a render. it is a brush. Borders should always be used.
What typo???
[/b]
Your colours look like crap, literally.
And using a downloaded brush is MUCH worse than if you used a render, which shows it isn't all your work, and that you cannot make good signatures without the support of downloaded brushes. Wait, even with downloaded brushes your sigs look like shit.
Owned.Quote:
LOL! Where in the art of signature making, is it a rule that you must have a border? Where i ask? Nowhere. How on earth do you think you can give rules to art? You can't. It's about creativity. It's about being different. Making things unique and astounding. So do you still insist on trying to make me believe that it's a well known fact that 1px borders are an absolute must on a signature?
Your colours look like crap, literally.
And using a downloaded brush is MUCH worse than if you used a render, which shows it isn't all your work, and that you cannot make good signatures without the support of downloaded brushes. Wait, even with downloaded brushes your sigs look like shit.
[/b]
Look at the light source. Look at where the light falls on the character. If that's not lighting, I have no idea what is it called.Quote:
There is NO lighting in those sigs.
[/b]
:lol:Quote:
half you here cant make a decent sig
[/b]
Since when when time spent = Good sig?Quote:
He spent no time on those sigs
[/b]
as I said there is no objective description of what is "good"... only subjective perceptions of what people think..Quote:
because HONOSTLY they look shitty as hell.
[/b]
and all of those who voted for sobek thinks that it looks better.. and vice versa..
and technically, it is executed better IMO.
Quote:
Thats what thier there for dumbass, its the way you use them that matters. Thats like saying "Here's a pencil, instead you go and make your own(choppin wood and getting lead etc..)
[/b]
...I'm sorry? I couldn't read your well-thought-out, literate, sentence. Perhaps it was because it was just dripping with maturity. I suppose a "dumbass" like me wouldn't understand it.
In addition to this poor excuse for a response, your analogy is completely invalid. It is NOT like saying ""Here's a pencil, instead you go and make your own(choppin wood and getting lead etc..)"
Rather, it is someone handing you their art, and using it as your own. They give you permission, yes, but it is still not your work. The whole downloaded brushes fix just blows my mind. Only times I will use one is for lighting tweaks or other minor effects. Yours, however, is the entire piece.
I do partially agree with your post, about it being in the way you use the brushes.. and I suppose the "way you used them" was very complicated. Allow me to demonstrate. I'll go slow so nobody gets left behind.
1) Everybody take your right hand
2) Place firmly on mouse, or take your index finger and place on touchpad, for our friends with laptops
3) Ever so slowly move your pointer (the white arrow on the screen) toward the brushes pallete
*slight pause for our slow learners*
Thanks again for joining us, let's get back to the lesson.
4) Once you have selected your brushes, choose a color from the color window
5) (This is perhaps the most difficult step of all) Click as needed on your document until you have an original-looking piece of art
6) Add color layer, hue saturation layer, or color balance layer if you feel daring
7) Apply shitty text and border for extra points.
Hope I didn't reveal too much of your secret. Now I'd just like to point out one more thing. You saidWell if you would have followed your own advice, stopped arguing, and had never made that unintelligent and immature post, I would never have had to say anything more. But no, you couldn't help yourself.Quote:
Done arguing, just vote[/b]
Good day to you, again, sir.
-Sui.
Your saying i got owned. By Sobek. Who's opinion is worth less then 2 cents.
What the **** do you think a brush is for. You use brushs' to dumbass. Your calling my sigs shit... look at yours. Thier not even half as good. Broaden your minds and get the fk out of CX(apply's to most of you)
GG owned!
self contradictory :lol:Quote:
Broaden your minds
[/b]
I use a brush to dumbass? I didn't think dumbass was a verb. Perhaps you should go back to school.Quote:
What the **** do you think a brush is for. You use brushs' to dumbass.
[/b]
First of all, you have absolutely NO right to call your sigs better than someone else's. This is a battle, in which people come in and judge your sigs and choose whose should win. It is their opinion that matters here, not yours. Also, sideline, last time I checked you were losing.Quote:
Your calling my sigs shit... look at yours. Thier not even half as good.
[/b]
WE need to broaden our minds? This coming from the person who just said his own sigs were better than others? This also ironically coming from the same person whose sigs are really not his work, but rather the work of the brush creator. The only thing I need to braoden my mind to is the level of stupidity that is present in our society, demonstrated by the likes of you.Quote:
Broaden your minds and get the fk out of CX(apply's to most of you)
GG owned!
[/b]
Hardly.Quote:
GG owned!
[/b]
gg.
You forgot it's also coming from a person who just said that borders are required in a signature, and without one you automatically lose in a real battle.Quote:
WE need to broaden our minds? This coming from the person who just said his own sigs were better than others? This also ironically coming from the same person whose sigs are really not his work, but rather the work of the brush creator. The only thing I need to braoden my mind to is the level of stupidity that is present in our society, demonstrated by the likes of you.
[/b]
oh btw, sui owned you. again.
How about we stop the bickering and get back to the voting.
I believe that was said about 5 posts up, but nobody listened. perhaps it would be better for everyone to just get it out now rather than have it leak into other threads. anarchy needed to stop running his mouth and we will be in good shape.Quote:
How about we stop the bickering and get back to the voting.
[/b]
anyways, i still believe it's 7-3 sobek.
Most of these votes are hate votes, especially yours sui. No one owned me.
Yes i made a typo its supposed to be "Too" not to.
I just know im better then sobek. And thats a fact lol. i cant belive im debating this. He uses's brush's too, whats the point of a brush then???
Ill make a brushless sig and post it. Then we'll see how good you are sobek.
no nevermind **** making a new sig. I stopped making sigs a year ago, cuase thier a useless waste of time anyway. If i happen to make one ill post. otherwise gg
Well that was a fancy way of backing out of the battle. I'm not even going to touch your hypocrisies, I'm sure everyone recognizes them already. I'd just like to ask why my vote was a hate vote, when i gave ample reasons for my vote? Nice try on that one. Always have to have an excuse. We can't lose a battle fairly now, no we have to lose because we haven't made a sig in a year, or no we can't lose without the votes being stacked. Just can it.Quote:
Most of these votes are hate votes, especially yours sui. No one owned me.
Yes i made a typo its supposed to be "Too" not to.
I just know im better then sobek. And thats a fact lol. i cant belive im debating this. He uses's brush's too, whats the point of a brush then???
Ill make a brushless sig and post it. Then we'll see how good you are sobek.
no nevermind **** making a new sig. I stopped making sigs a year ago, cuase thier a useless waste of time anyway. If i happen to make one ill post. otherwise gg
[/b]
But.. at least you can stop bitching now, and we can move on.
Congrats on the win, sobek.
Everybody has their own way of making sigs, I personally don't think theres a right or wrong way of doing it. It should be whatever way makes the individual happy not what makes everyone else happy.
If you guys want to debate this topic further then go start a topic in the debate forum. This is the battle forum, so battle or shut up.
in before closing :D
also sobek gmvizzle
8-3, sobek gets the win. congrats. gl next time anarchy.
no brushes, its called soemthing called c4d my friend, owned yet again,
YEAH ITS OPEN!!! Sobek gmv without a doubt. Why you might ask? Well i love the colors i like the effect, even though i would sharpen it alittle to me its more to look at and he seems to have put more time into it. Anarachy's sig just looks like a render brushed with alot of dled brushes, colored, then brightness/contrast....and his second sig....wtf that shit is ugly as hell imo.
if this was still going no way on the planet id vote for sobeks, sobeks sig is an eyesoar anarchys is pleasant and flows nicley
and most of all actually looks good looks like a sig and who cares if a sig is original, original basically means wierd and if its original and ugly why the **** would one want? nice job anarchy
fine.. we'll leave this open until someone reaches 10
sobek- 9
anarchy-4
also i bet if anarchy had as many post as sobeks votes would be scattered around a little bit more in my opinion. Sobeks is more original but doesn't look good even if he didn't use brushes or anything brushes are meant to be used and can turn up some cool pieces of work. Anarchys is less original the color choice is nice and is almost always pleasant on everyones eyes especially mine when i look at sobeks i cringe, its just not a good sig by sobek he can do better -peace-
also my dad is an artist he paints paintings and went to art school i know this doesn't have much to do with digital art but i show him your guys sigs on here and just about everyones sig on here he points out mistakes that all you guys make which are pretty bad that most true paid graphics designers would frown upon
Ahhh, i was speaking to Elektrik yesterday, and he said the only reason he voted for Anarchy was because we had beef. So it would really be 10-3.
that settles it.
congrats on the win, sobek.
nice try, anarchy.
closed.
