no not kelly lebrock !! lol
c@c welcome
http://img188.imageshack.us/img188/892/womaninred.png
woman in red
Printable View
-
10-22-2009, 07:26 AMXelowoman in red
-
10-22-2009, 07:38 AMTouch
I love the idea! Looks nice... but maybe a little but too "hard". A great text would be nice :D
-
10-22-2009, 07:39 AMMuffun
Low quality...
-
10-22-2009, 09:12 AM--J.O.N--
low quality
-
10-23-2009, 03:05 AMXelowhat is lq here?Quote:
Originally Posted by --J.O.N--
-
10-23-2009, 03:30 AM--J.O.N--
lq means low quality
-
10-23-2009, 04:06 AM+s9.Oath
lq or tooo sharp one of the 2 still a good tag man love the color
-
10-23-2009, 04:19 AMPapichoolo
It looks like its a bit LQ. Other then that a good work.
-
10-23-2009, 01:47 PMTakken
LQ. Seemed over sharpened. Needs flow.
-
10-23-2009, 03:30 PMDR809So much could be done to make this piece better, however i love the concept of it and where you were going with it. Just keep practicing and you'd get it down next time.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xelo
-
10-23-2009, 07:40 PMXenoDestruction
Like they said, LQ or oversharpened. I agree with DR809, i love the concept but the feeling it give to me... i dunno how to explain but, keep practicing.
-
10-23-2009, 08:59 PMEpiphdude...there is flow..Quote:
Originally Posted by Takken
anyway, pretty cool, but the LQ-ness kills it a bit, IMO.. -
10-24-2009, 10:26 AMXelo
wow, so many comments, thankies all!!
In this tag nothing was sharpened, so maybe i should have blurred some more parts?
The hardest part actually was to render the focal, lol.. i had c4d with nice curves and tried to make a kind of flowery form with the focal in it, then colorized it and blurred some.. -
10-25-2009, 06:37 AMNutter
Guys, would it be possible to add more information and feedback to the sig than, "Low Quality..."
If you aren't going to post anything constructive, then please don't spam the thread.
