http://mirrorimg.net/images/kc.png
Printable View
Wat! No replies in a day?
render needs to be blended better, this sig is like half render
I havent seen the original render so im not quite sure how much space it takes up but overall i like it. good color
Great one Anthony! The lighting is really good and the blending is perfect.
Well, it's not a bad tag...Though it lacks flow, depth and the lighting could use some tweaks. I agree with what Helix said the majority of your sig is just render very little background and too much foreground. Not liking the border either.
It looks good. Lighting is great, depth is good as is the little blending that would have been possible. I don't see any need to "tweak" anything convening depth or lighting. Also, it's not a render, so yeah, not sure where the whole "It's mostly render" concept came from. I'm also not sure how you can can directly change the flow in a stock without having to remake the whole thing, so for what IS present, it's rather good.
The border isn't something I like either, xD
http://mirrorimg.net/images/pxy.jpeg
It's a stock, I'm pretty sure it's blended enough, lol. Thanks for the comment.
Thanks. :) I appreciate it.
:o Thanks! Means a lot. :)
Ah! I need to fix a lot then. Thanks for the comment. :)
i like this i think the lighting and effects are really nice and fit well.
only thing for me is the background seems abit over blurred and makes the render look abit off.
Looks great to me :)
Good lighting, effects etc.. kiu!!
Don't post your work here if you don't want critique. You want me to be honest? this signature is not good, the blending on the render is off and it blocks half the image which throws off the balance. Doesn't really look like you did much else besides smudge up the background, or add a stock I don't know which, and then add some fancy lighting and dots. Not to mention the fact that the lighting is off, you have multiple areas of random light and dark which throw off the focal point of this signature.
Don't post why you disagree with what people say. If they post it, it's the truth, work on it, and change it next time, or don't. and continue to design bad signatures.
Sorry for the honesty but you had to find out someday.
Don't post your critique here if you don't want to seem silly. You want me to be honest? This critique is not good. The reasoning is off and it blocks half your brain which throws off your balance. Doesn't really look like you read what he said, or you ignored it, I don't know which, and then added some fancy adjectives. Not to mention the fact that the wording is off, you have multiple critiques which throw off the focal point of your CnC.
=D =D
If they post it, it's the truth? That's a little silly don't you think? And now you keep insisting on calling his signature bad which is rude and childish and makes you look like an angry beaver who can't handle someone disagreeing with them. O.oQuote:
Don't post why you disagree with what people say. If they post it, it's the truth, work on it, and change it next time, or don't. and continue to design bad signatures.
People disagree on sigs all the time, obviously what people post are opinions and you are free to agree or disagree with those. You said the blending was bad, I said it was good, if what people post is true, then how are we both right...:eek:
I'm sure he already knew that some people are too insecure to have others disagree with them, you didn't need to help him find that out. >.<Quote:
Sorry for the honesty but you had to find out someday.
You're right Fork it's not worth arguing with noobs