Halo2sig

[Elleray]

i made halo 2 sig, yeah, lots of em, but mines the best i had to make the explosion from the gun. and couldnt find ne good brushes for it :P cnc welcomed


wow, 3 sigs in one day. ive had a 2 week withdrawl, no photoshop whatsoever

[CrazyGamer]

LOL the best(?)....... The BG looks really f'd up imo. And the text isn't a good choice. The bg is way to contrasty. And that render i belive already had a bleast coming out of it and if ne thing you made it worse. And i see that you decided to slap a render onto a bg lol. Your words not mine. I mean it looks ok but i think that your blue one was better.

[AcidGlow]

Originally posted by CrazyGamer@54 Minutes Ago
LOL the best(?).......

1.The BG looks really f'd up imo. The bg is way to contrasty.
2.And the text isn't a good choice.
3.And that render i belive already had a bleast coming out of it and if ne thing you made it worse.
4.And i see that you decided to slap a render onto a bg lol.

Your words not mine. I mean it looks ok but i think that your blue one was better.

[snapback]103870[/snapback]

I disagree with everything. You dunno what you're talking about. :P

1. The background is not highly contrasted, it's fine just how it is.

2. His text work is damn fine for the sig.

3. There was a muzzle flare with that render but he changed it. His is actually better then the original.

4. Look at your sig.....or alot of other peoples..a render on a background..so your point is?

So..to me, I don't think you have a clue of what you're talking about..you're just shooting out comments you don't know about 'cause alot of your sigs were pretty bad...This guy's sig is very well done.

And last, only newbs start there sentences with "LOL" and end with "lol".


Oh yea, Ell, the sig is marvelous. 10/10 yo. It's got a great flow to it. Nothing wrong with it in my eyes. Good job.

[Twan]

Originally posted by AcidGlow@1 Hour Ago
I disagree with everything. You dunno what you're talking about. :P

1. The background is not highly contrasted, it's fine just how it is.*

2. His text work is damn fine for the sig.

3. There was a muzzle flare with that render but he changed it. His is actually better then the original.

4. Look at your sig.....or alot of other peoples..a render on a background..so your point is?

So..to me, I don't think you have a clue of what you're talking about..you're just shooting out comments you don't know about 'cause alot of your sigs were pretty bad...This guy's sig is very well done.

And last, only newbs start there sentences with "LOL" and end with* "lol".


Oh yea, Ell, the sig is marvelous. 10/10 yo. It's got a great flow to it. Nothing wrong with it in my eyes. Good job.

[snapback]103898[/snapback]

I fully agree. I love the bg.

[Freak]

I really dig that sig. Nice work man! I wouldn't change a thing.

[jerner]

It's looking really good, although it seems like there's too many colors in it. Maybe it's just me, but that is what I think, when you look at the blue reflection on his armor, it just looks wrong (the color), if you change that I would think it'd look much much better ;D keep up the good work!

[Deadloader]

cg is a crazy mother fucker, this sig is uber hax man :lol:

it's got eveything a sig need really...

just one thing.... what're those wavey square brushes in the background i want them :lol:

[keden]

I love it man, I'm still trying to find out how to make a sig like that, cuz i just love it (didnt i say that already :lol: :P )

[Samuel]

I quite like it. You need to fix the colors like jerner said. Good work mate, keep it up.

[conspired]

I like how those "wavy square" designs give the background more texture. Text, render, bg all look fine to me. Only thing that bugs would would be the colors as stated before. Otherwise, keep up the good work.