ok...

[Freak]

[SgtSwabs]

Well....theres not really much to comment on....Nice use of light I guess...

[Freak]

There's more to this tag than you might think.

[Nightfire]

Looks like the bottom of an iceberh lol. I think it's to empty from what I'm seeing . Also I can barely read you text, and it looks like it says "REA then an upside down R."

atm for a sig I don't think it does well but if you had some effects maybe.

[Krimsyn]

is tag the new word for sig?

anyways, although it looks like you've spent some time on it. it also looks like not a whole lot at the same time. i don't know if you were aiming for minimalism. but i don't think complex minimalism works.

[PREDATOR.]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Freak &#064; Apr 13 2006, 02&#58;42 AM) [snapback]165436[/snapback]</div>

[/b]

I dunno why... But i really like that one.

[Adam]

<div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(Kaleidoscope &#064; Apr 15 2006, 03&#58;35 AM) [snapback]165740[/snapback]</div>

is tag the new word for sig?

[/b]

Yes, some people have started calling them tags, though i thought &#39;tag&#39; was a graffiti term. Anyway the sig is very...abstract. I&#39;d try maybe a little stronger light source. And your text is very hard to read it just looks like &#39;reak&#39;

[Dale]

As Kaleidoscope said, you don&#39;t tend to use detail in minimalism. This just looks unfinished or something, also. WTF Is it. It doesn&#39;t really look like an abstract peice, but there&#39;s no sign as to what the image / brushing is.

[/confused]

[Freak]

No brushing...just defaults and c4d.