2 more news one.. (2 other new down below this)

[Magic]

the first one is just a simple pixel stretch i kn ow but anyone know what i could add to it?

[undertone]

i know everyones starting to get sick of pixel stretches (or already has) but i think they still look sexhay. you could smudge over the pixel stretch and overlay it, or you could add some brushing to make it a little more interesting. but honestly i think its simplicity is its strength here. the text could be better though. hard to read on my resolution.

the second one is just weak. the m-colour is a little bland and doesnt do much. the brushing is very one dimensional... meaning that it has no depth. the render looks cool but isnt blended very well. again the text looks too small and boring. your somewhere between making the text totaly unimportant and making the text a large part of the sig. however if you want to make the text unimportant youd have to really make the sig more impressive.

[jeebin]

i like the bottom one better than the top one

yur text needs works...looks the sanme in almost all yur sigs

other than that good

(comment on my new ones..fascinate and keys)

[Magic]

can u suggest some fonts for me bro? impact is the one i use right now

[jeebin]

dafont.com has some good pixel fonts that u mite be able to use

1001fonts.com maybe has some more of the specialized fonts u want

juss search on those and pick out what u like

(comment mine)

[Henry]

Arial, Arial Black, Times new Roman, Courier.
On the first you should tone down the scanlines and put them behind the render
Also you should do some brushing in white over the scanlines.
The second is bad. monotonal, overcontrasted render, not blended.

I like the font on the first though

[Magic]

i just fixed them the link was broken or something... thanks henry i'll try those