new sig

[forever.lost]

what do you thing?

[IdentidY]

pretty cool, and creepy! the colors stand out which is a plus, i like it 9/10!

i dont mind, but if ur using the sig, why post the pic again? lol

[forever.lost]

lol i wasn't using it when i posted it i ended up chaning it like 4 post later

[SgtSwabs]

Can barely see the render, the background is some blurred up trees and plants? Also the text is horrible, "horrible" may be a harsh word to use but it really is. Tbh im confused why Identity gave it 9/10 but whatever, his opinion. Keep trying you'll get better.

[forever.lost]

thats how i wanted the render to be and yes the background is trees and plants

[Dale]

Did you actually paint any of this? Or just put 2 stocks together. The text looks strange, it's hard to read and it doesn't even fit. And the bar down the middle is badly placed and just plain weird. . . i don't rate signatures.. it's stupid.

[Magic]

text is bad really bad stay simple use blending options to put effects on it
i dont even know what that render is and i have no idea why u would want to use a render where no one could tell what it was...

[IdentidY]

wow u guys are picky! i can easily read the text, i have to admit the bar is strange..but the render is supposed to be hard to see

"why look for what cant be found?"

plus, who cares if i rate sigs, its not stupid...ur open minded. :/

the render kinda looks like samus to me

[forever.lost]

render:

remake:

[Magic]

should try a cd4 background for that render... or i will because that would be a cool render for it
mind if i use it?