GFXVoid Graphic Design Forum

Remove Text Formatting
Loading...

» Online Users: 1,769

0 members and 1,769 guests
No Members online

» Site Navigation

 > FAQ

» Stats

Members: 35,443
Threads: 103,072
Posts: 826,684
Top Poster: cc.RadillacVIII (7,429)
Welcome to our newest member, Lekelindids
Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Rise Against

  1. #1

    Default Rise Against



    It's suppose to portray what the quiet people who get punk'd everyday think about when people fuck with them.

    Not so good, but It's something new I made. I think the problem is overblend, It needs a bit more focus toward the focal point.
    Recent:
    Favorite:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    yeah. the stock doesn't really fit with the style, which is why the focus isn't so great. the stock looks too flat to be put in a sig with good depth.

    name influenced by the band?

  3. #3

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jsoosiah View Post
    yeah. the stock doesn't really fit with the style, which is why the focus isn't so great. the stock looks too flat to be put in a sig with good depth.

    name influenced by the band?
    When I made it, I was thinking of a name and it happened to fit perfectly.

    And it's not a stock. I've never used stocks in my life.

    Edit: Btw, there's a small radial blur shadow behind the focal to give it depth for a lunging feel.
    Last edited by killaziller; 06-21-2007 at 12:19 AM. Reason: Didn't want to double post.
    Recent:
    Favorite:

  4. #4
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    so you made the dude from scratch then? either way, I still think he doesn't fit well with the effects you have there. better to have something with more depth to go with the sig. what do you think?

  5. #5

    Default

    A stock is something like premade with a background and everything, so it's a render.

    The darken may have done too much to the focal, but I think a widened reversed radial will fix it up a bit.
    Recent:
    Favorite:

  6. #6
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    1,729

    Default

    there's no official definition for stocks/renders, they can be the same thing even. i figure a stock image to be some pic you use. simple as that. and the term 'render' is wrong for cutouts (renders = c4d ect.), but it seems to have been accepted so it's a moot point pretty much. anyway, that's a stupid thing to argue about, so i'll leave it at that.

    but yeah, mess with that lighting, that's the only problem really.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    2,079

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by jsoosiah View Post
    there's no official definition for stocks/renders, they can be the same thing even. i figure a stock image to be some pic you use. simple as that. and the term 'render' is wrong for cutouts (renders = c4d ect.), but it seems to have been accepted so it's a moot point pretty much. anyway, that's a stupid thing to argue about, so i'll leave it at that.

    but yeah, mess with that lighting, that's the only problem really.
    yeah the term render is misapplied to images used for signatures. that is a stock image as far as i'm concerned. a render is an object rendered (no shit huh?). whatever anyway.

    this is a signature, goes in the sigs section. and i agree with jsoosiah, everything hes said.


  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2007
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    4,197

    Default

    I dont have so much to say cuz jsoosiah have said it all.




Similar Threads

  1. Planet Rise
    By *Peng* in forum Digital Art
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-24-2006, 06:32 AM
  2. rise
    By ROTD in forum Digital Art
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-18-2005, 02:14 PM
  3. Rise Of Nations
    By Umbee in forum Sigs & Manips
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 11-13-2005, 10:20 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Powered by vBadvanced CMPS v4.1.1